Nah, I'll pick up some review credit.
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Jernej Azarija wrote:
> Tom,
>
> I have created a patch implementing the edge/arc transitive tests. I
> mentioned on the wiki page that the main idea of the test was suggested by
> you, but in case you want to claim any extra
Thank you, Jernej, for bringing up this issue. Turns out I've been
lazy, and hadn't carefully thought about degenerate cases. The line
graph is a bad test because the claw and triangle have the same line
graph... the disconnected pair (claw + C_3) has a vertex-transitive
line graph! The followin
Oops, didn't see your reply before I posted. Not counting the empty
graph is very very strange. At the very least OEIS needs to be
updated to have a proper definition to warn people that the empty
graph is excluded.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On 2012-10-30, Jerne