Thank you. http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15024 will fix this.
On Wednesday, 11 September 2013 03:34:05 UTC-7, Jesus Torrado wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> With respect to the spherical Bessel functions, I found that for some Real
> arguments one may find a bug related to the way Sage interprets Maxima
Regarding special functions, I am obviously aware of the symbolic
capabilities of Sage that are inherited from Maxima, which has a collection
of stuff that can be dressed up one way or another. Maxima is hardly
complete even with respect to the functions included, and the external list
develo
Hi all,
With respect to the spherical Bessel functions, I found that for some Real
arguments one may find a bug related to the way Sage interprets Maxima
numbers (which I personally don't understand).
As I think it is related, here it is:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/sage-devel/m
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:24 PM, rjf wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, September 10, 2013 1:36:02 PM UTC-7, Eviatar wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I made a table of the status of special functions in Sage, based on the
>> one in the Digital Library of Mathematical Functions. I thought it would be
>> of interest t
On 9/10/2013 7:04 PM, William Stein wrote:
And did you actually look at the linked patch?
Not when I wrote that note.
I looked at http://www.phas.ubc.ca/~eviatarb/?e=11
If this is what dlmf is supposed to be upgraded to include, that's what
I was complaining about.
On your prompting, I l
