Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sphinx TODO extension

2011-04-27 Thread Pablo De Napoli
Please review ticket #10620 to upgrade sphynix Pablo On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Keshav Kini wrote: > I also prefer trac, but I know why: it's shorter! Also it's more clearly > related to trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac . Patch comments also say stuff like > "trac #1234", not "ticket #1234".

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sphinx TODO extension

2011-04-25 Thread Florent Hivert
> > It seems like a good idea to me. Should we also add a comment to the > > developer's guide about this kind of mark-up for the documentation? > > Good idea. Done. In the same veins, I think that links to trac ticket should be hyperlinks. Sphinx extlinks extension make it very easy. The only

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sphinx TODO extension

2011-04-25 Thread Florent Hivert
Hi John, > > I'm working on #9128 whose goal is to resolve dangling links by looking in > > python docs and in sage.all. On the way, I noticed that there are lots of > > todos in the doc but no systematic way to handle them in sage. Fortunately, > > there is a nice sphinx extension to handle