Re: [sage-devel] Re: Some questions about Sage goals

2009-11-22 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
cool-RR wrote: > I understand it's a volunteer project, and there's a lot of work involved. > > But it seems that we weren't talking exactly about the same thing: I > didn't talk about porting the millions of lines of code to Windows; I > talked about making the VM process automatic and seamles

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Some questions about Sage goals

2009-11-22 Thread William Stein
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 2:07 AM, cool-RR wrote: > I understand it's a volunteer project, and there's a lot of work involved. > But it seems that we weren't talking exactly about the same thing: I didn't > talk about porting the millions of lines of code to Windows; I talked about > making the VM p

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Some questions about Sage goals

2009-11-22 Thread cool-RR
> > > > > > Okay, update: > > > > Now I downloaded Sage for Windows. I see that I have to download the > > VirtualBox thing and install it-- Pretty annoying. It would have been > > nice if you just gave me one file to run which would run virtualbox by > > itself with the sage image loaded. And now

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Some questions about Sage goals

2009-11-21 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 5:51 AM, cool-RR wrote: > > > On Nov 19, 5:55 pm, Harald Schilly wrote: >> On Nov 19, 7:37 am, Jan Groenewald wrote: >> >> > Is VMWARE outdated >> > and virtualbox recommended? >> >> There is no vmware image. The vmware instructions are just for >> reference and they were

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Some questions about Sage goals

2009-11-19 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Harald Schilly wrote: > On Nov 19, 7:37 am, Jan Groenewald wrote: >> Is VMWARE outdated >> and virtualbox recommended? > > There is no vmware image. The vmware instructions are just for > reference and they were used some time ago. > > But you do not need them at

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Some questions about Sage goals

2009-11-18 Thread Jan Groenewald
Hi On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:05:05PM -0800, cool-RR wrote: > > As SAGE is unix based, the VMware is necessary to run on a windows > > platform. Consider a user friendly Linux distribution like Ubuntu > > or whatever is common where you work/study, as you can then run > > SAGE natively. > > I don

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Some questions about Sage goals

2009-11-18 Thread Mike Hansen
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 1:05 PM, cool-RR wrote: > I don't understand. Imagine a non-computer-savvy scientist who uses > Windows and wants to use Sage. I imagine this is a pretty big > percentage of scientists. Are you telling him, "To use Sage you must > operate a VM, or switch operating system"?