Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage and gcc 4.3.0

2011-04-06 Thread Han Frederic
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 04:12:37PM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > On 04/ 5/11 03:06 PM, Bill Hart wrote: >> One possibly data point is that GCC 4.3.2 miscompiles GMP and MPIR on >> x86_64 and as far as I know cannot and will not be worked around. > > Thank you for that. I'm not going to address t

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage and gcc 4.3.0

2011-04-05 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 04/ 5/11 03:06 PM, Bill Hart wrote: One possibly data point is that GCC 4.3.2 miscompiles GMP and MPIR on x86_64 and as far as I know cannot and will not be worked around. Thank you for that. I'm not going to address the issue now, but if that is the case, we should check for gcc 4.3.2 and

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage and gcc 4.3.0

2011-04-03 Thread David Kirkby
On 3 April 2011 15:47, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > IMHO gcc 4.3.0 is not relevant any more, and it's hard to imagine > anyone needing to build Sage with gcc 4.3.0 now... But it would still be nice to document whether there are issues with gcc 4.3.0, since we claim Sage works with gcc >= 4.0.1 and tes