On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 06:05:22 Volker Braun wrote:
> Looks like intel uses a completely different naming scheme instead
> of liblapack.so / libcblas.so / libf77blas.so. Francois' suggestion of
> renaming the intel MKL libraries to something standard is a good one, though
> it might not work. Since in
On Friday, August 12, 2011 9:27:59 AM UTC-4, François wrote:
>
> \I think that's the only way that has a chance of working with a stock sage
> and
> sage's spkgs.
If a simple rename of the libraries doesn't work one could build a stub
library that translates the usual blas/lapack into intel MK
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 06:05:22 Volker Braun wrote:
> Looks like intel uses a completely different naming scheme instead
> of liblapack.so / libcblas.so / libf77blas.so. Francois' suggestion of
> renaming the intel MKL libraries to something standard is a good one, though
> it might not work. Since in
