On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
> That's interesting. I wonder if the kernel bit could be used in SageTeX,
> where I have a bunch of Sage commands and want to get their outputs.
> Perhaps this could make that process much simpler and more extensible.
Sure, in the end an ipython
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 at 11:57AM -0800, Fernando Perez wrote:
> I'm not sure exactly how Sage initializes IPython, but it would be
> great if in the port to 0.12, you were able to do everything needed
> for the Sage terminal application as a profile. The profile machinery
> is much more robust now,
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> Feel free to CC this message over to the ipython list if you want to take up
> the discussion there.
Will do that.
Cheers,
f
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an em
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> That sounds like a great idea. One of the last things we wanted to do
> before releasing the big 1.0 version is to write more tests and
> documentation about the protocol. Things have been on hold for the last
> little while (school has been
