Re: [sage-devel] Re: Poll: Making sage-mode a standard package

2012-06-01 Thread Ivan Andrus
On Jun 1, 2012, at 7:55 AM, syd.lavas...@gmail.com wrote: > [X] Make it standard at some point in the "near" future > > Mainly because I think everybody should use emacs as their operating system. > it will save their time and the money they spend on buying fancey computers. > Also Nicolas is v

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Poll: Making sage-mode a standard package

2012-05-28 Thread Ivan Andrus
On May 26, 2012, at 7:31 PM, Benjamin Jones wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote: >> On May 26, 2012, at 7:09 PM, Benjamin Jones wrote: >>> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote: >>> No offense taken. Who knows what's going to happen after I graduate fo

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Poll: Making sage-mode a standard package

2012-05-26 Thread Benjamin Jones
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote: > On May 26, 2012, at 7:09 PM, Benjamin Jones wrote: >> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote: >> >>> >>> No offense taken.  Who knows what's going to happen after I graduate for >>> example—maybe I'll get a full time job fixing bu

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Poll: Making sage-mode a standard package

2012-05-26 Thread Ivan Andrus
On May 26, 2012, at 7:09 PM, Benjamin Jones wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote: > >> >> No offense taken. Who knows what's going to happen after I graduate for >> example—maybe I'll get a full time job fixing bugs in Sage, or maybe I'll be >> flipping burgers. :-) >> >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Poll: Making sage-mode a standard package

2012-05-26 Thread Benjamin Jones
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote: > > No offense taken.  Who knows what's going to happen after I graduate for > example—maybe I'll get a full time job fixing bugs in Sage, or maybe I'll be > flipping burgers. :-) > > It's important to remember that if it's standard someone _has

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Poll: Making sage-mode a standard package

2012-05-26 Thread Ivan Andrus
On May 26, 2012, at 2:46 PM, P Purkayastha wrote: > On Saturday, May 26, 2012 8:31:11 PM UTC+8, P Purkayastha wrote: > On Saturday, May 26, 2012 5:50:12 PM UTC+8, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On 2012-05-25, Ivan Andrus wrote: > > Dear all sage and emacs (or not) users, > > > > [ ] Make it standard a

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Poll: Making sage-mode a standard package

2012-05-26 Thread Ivan Andrus
On May 26, 2012, at 11:50 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On 2012-05-25, Ivan Andrus wrote: >> Dear all sage and emacs (or not) users, >> >> [ ] Make it standard at some point in the "near" future. >> [ ] Don't make it standard and close the ticket. >> [ ] Don't make it standard now, but don't close

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Poll: Making sage-mode a standard package

2012-05-26 Thread Ivan Andrus
On May 26, 2012, at 1:11 AM, Keshav Kini wrote: > Ivan Andrus writes: >> Dear all sage and emacs (or not) users, >> >> Since I've been working on sage-mode a bit recently I thought I would look >> at trac and try to fix any sage-mode related bugs there. I found #2666 >> which wants to make sag

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Poll: Making sage-mode a standard package

2012-05-26 Thread Julien Puydt
Le vendredi 25 mai, Keshav Kini a écrit: > This. It is very standard for programs to include relevant emacs modes > and vim syntax/indent/whatever files in their source distribution. > Cython does this, for example, as does GAP. This is a very important point which bears repeating : sage should tr

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Poll: Making sage-mode a standard package

2012-05-25 Thread Justin C. Walker
On May 25, 2012, at 16:27 , Volker Braun wrote: > [X] Make it standard at some point in the "near" future. > > Its tiny, too... "Tiny" is not a good reason to increase the number of moving parts. -- Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon at Large Institute for the Absorption of Federal Funds --