Re: [sage-devel] Re: Mathematica language vs. python

2012-04-25 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 04/25/12 01:51 AM, rjf wrote: Someone should tell the survey people that "it's" is not the possessive form of it. "It's" is a contraction for "it is". The possessive is "its". If you want a slightly more informative comparison, try common lisp vs python. Why is that any more informati

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Mathematica language vs. python

2012-04-24 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 04/24/12 06:21 PM, Keshav Kini wrote: I find it a little bizarre that almost 40% of respondents consider Python better at symbolic manipulation than Mathematica.Mathematica is practically built for symbolic manipulation, and in Sage a lot of hard work has gone into pynac because plain Python

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Mathematica language vs. python

2012-04-24 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 04/24/12 06:21 PM, Keshav Kini wrote: Jason Grout writes: Notice that the ratings are most dissimilar from Python (see bottom of page)! Indeed, it is very interesting to look at the comparison page: http://hammerprinciple.com/therighttool/items/mathematica/python I find it a little bizar