Re: [sage-devel] Re: List condensation

2011-10-30 Thread Francois Bissey
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 02:35:46 Simon King wrote: > > It is a > > bit of pity. sage-on-gentoo generates a bit of traffic on the > > gentoo-science mailing list and the occasional thread here. > > sage-on-gentoo? Is that yet another list I haven't been aware of? Just for clarification I work on portin

Re: [sage-devel] Re: List condensation

2011-08-01 Thread Francois Bissey
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 02:35:46 Simon King wrote: > > It is a > > bit of pity. sage-on-gentoo generates a bit of traffic on the > > gentoo-science mailing list and the occasional thread here. > > sage-on-gentoo? Is that yet another list I haven't been aware of? Just for clarification I work on portin

Re: [sage-devel] Re: List condensation

2011-08-01 Thread John Cremona
Whenever I have suggested that a discussion move from sage-devel to sage-algebra or sage-nt, it has not been because I did not want to see it on sage-devel, but only because there are people who I thought would be interested and have something useful to say on the topic who would probably not see i

Re: [sage-devel] Re: List condensation

2011-08-01 Thread John Cremona
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Simon King wrote: > Hi Francois and all, > > On 1 Aug., 05:52, Francois Bissey > wrote: >> In the case of sage-marketing, no impact what so ever since I had no clue >> such a list existed. > > QED... > >> It is a >> bit of pity. sage-on-gentoo generates a bit of t

Re: [sage-devel] Re: List condensation

2011-07-31 Thread Francois Bissey
> Hi Francois, > > On 31 Jul., 23:48, Francois Bissey > > wrote: > > You forgot debian-sage > > Indeed. Sorry. > > Actually I attempted completeness; I did some searches, but debian- > sage has not been found. It is another list that had no activity since > Oct. 05, 2010. > > I hope you allow