It seems to be a problem with dynamic linking in Mac OS X 10.6. I
personally don' t know, since I don't own a Mac.
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:29 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 18, 9:46 am, Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
>> They are under review as optional packages. In order to become
>
> Okay, as su
They are under review as optional packages. In order to become
standard packages, they must be voted in here at sage-devel, and must
have 2 maintainers (iirc[1]).
[1] http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/msg/6ea0a0e0a0a2a71a
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 8:09 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 17,
New packages are up at #7344 and #7345
(http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7344 and
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7345) for review that should
hopefully work for all platforms.
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
> Hi,
>
> SAGE_BINARY_BUILD was introduced as
Hi,
SAGE_BINARY_BUILD was introduced as a compromise when it was decided
that libjpeg and libtiff were to be introduced first as optional
packages, since PIL is a standard package. Without SAGE_BINARY_BUILD
set, binary distributions have PIL link with libjpeg and libtiff as
shared libraries, which
