Re: [sage-devel] Re: Hard time building sage to review a ticket

2014-06-13 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 13/06/2014 15:57, Julien Puydt a écrit : Le 13/06/2014 15:21, Volker Braun a écrit : I'm pretty sure you are on an old version of Sage... git clone git://git.sagemath.org/sage git checkout -b testjava origin/u/jdemeyer/ticket/14364 How is that old? Eh, that branch is based on 5.13 or s

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Hard time building sage to review a ticket

2014-06-13 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 13/06/2014 15:21, Volker Braun a écrit : I'm pretty sure you are on an old version of Sage... git clone git://git.sagemath.org/sage git checkout -b testjava origin/u/jdemeyer/ticket/14364 How is that old? Snark on #sagemath -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Hard time building sage to review a ticket

2014-06-13 Thread Volker Braun
I'm pretty sure you are on an old version of Sage... $ git trac find b02fff52f6d55663af31343bfaf3e35c53a9bc14 Commit has been merged in 6.2.rc1. commit ba423b1c343da22cd342102f6504df044691d0e7 Merge: 069e666 f6df279 Author: Release Manager Date: Fri Apr 25 19:44:48 2014 +0200 Trac #16208:

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Hard time building sage to review a ticket

2014-06-13 Thread Julien Puydt
Hi, Le 13/06/2014 14:45, Volker Braun a écrit : In C++11 it is unspecified whether ptrdiff_t (and other C typedefs) are injected into the global namespace or not. GCC is not at fault for restriciting its scope to only std::ptrdiff_t. Sigh. Then I guess I'll need to open a ticket and write a pa

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Hard time building sage to review a ticket

2014-06-13 Thread Volker Braun
In C++11 it is unspecified whether ptrdiff_t (and other C typedefs) are injected into the global namespace or not. GCC is not at fault for restriciting its scope to only std::ptrdiff_t. On Friday, June 13, 2014 1:27:34 PM UTC+1, Snark wrote: > > Hi, > > Le 12/06/2014 21:43, Julien Puydt a écri

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Hard time building sage to review a ticket

2014-06-13 Thread Julien Puydt
Hi, Le 12/06/2014 21:43, Julien Puydt a écrit : (2) ppl compiled. Point (2)... well... it's not a breakage if it compiles, but last time it gave issues... so there's still something to understand. I must say this "ptrdiff_t does not name a type" issue is interesting: I got rid of it by addi

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Hard time building sage to review a ticket

2014-06-13 Thread Julien Puydt
Hi, Le 12/06/2014 21:43, Julien Puydt a écrit : (1) cvxopt and scipy fail to compile because linear algebra libs aren't found ; Point (1) is what bothered me enough with the git checkout to start the thread, and I'll obviously need to investigate further. I think I got that part down... I'

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Hard time building sage to review a ticket

2014-06-12 Thread Julien Puydt
Hi, Le 12/06/2014 18:42, Volker Braun a écrit : Sounds like your gcc is broken... try "export SAGE_INSTALL_GCC=yes && make" Oh! Excellent point! I have gcc 4.9.0, which is a fairly recent version! Trying to compile sage 6.2 with it (from the tarball) ; adding -k to the MAKE export so I get a

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Hard time building sage to review a ticket

2014-06-12 Thread Volker Braun
Sounds like your gcc is broken... try "export SAGE_INSTALL_GCC=yes && make" On Thursday, June 12, 2014 4:48:43 PM UTC+1, Snark wrote: > > make > > I followed them again today, and it failed again, this time in ppl > because "'ptrdiff_t' does not name a type" -- so not the same problem. > > -

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Hard time building sage to review a ticket

2014-06-12 Thread Julien Puydt
Hi, Le 12/06/2014 10:12, leif a écrit : Julien Puydt wrote: I wanted to help review #14364. The (very old) testjava.sh foo, or was that a typo? So I cloned sage, Not immediately clear to me what you mean by that; which version of Sage? Already built and up-to-date? checked out the tick