Re: [sage-devel] Re: Exterior algebras.

2015-04-07 Thread David Joyner
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 9:12 AM, kcrisman wrote: > Sorry for dredging this up from the depths... > > So I see that http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14418 has a more explicit > interface. What gets me wondering about the current state in Sage is an > article in the most recent Notices which contains

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Exterior algebras.

2015-04-07 Thread kcrisman
Sorry for dredging this up from the depths... So I see that http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14418 has a more explicit interface. What gets me wondering about the current state in Sage is an article in the most recent Notices which contains a reference to https://sites.google.com/site/grassmann

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Exterior algebras.

2010-03-25 Thread Michael Brickenstein
Hi! For the simple case of exterior algebras there exists already ring creation code in the track ticket. It might be a little bit hacky, but it works for now. What is mainly needed, is cleaning the construction for Sage class hierarchies and coercions. Cheers, Michael Am 25.03.2010 um 10:10 s

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Exterior algebras.

2010-03-20 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 01:00:38PM -0700, bump wrote: > > I hope other people respond, too. I would suggest looking at > > > > > > > > and the code in sage/algebras/quatalg (for quaternion algebras): use > > this as one model for how to impleme

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Exterior algebras.

2010-03-19 Thread Mike Hansen
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:00 PM, bump wrote: >> I hope other people respond, too.  I would suggest looking at >> >> >> >> and the code in sage/algebras/quatalg (for quaternion algebras): use >> this as one model for how to implement a noncommut