This is now http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14277
On 15 March 2013 08:36, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 2013-03-15, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > sage: bool(f == g)
> > True
> > sage: bool([f] == [g])
> > True
> > sage: bool(matrix([f]) == matrix([g]))
> > False
>
>>
> >> That is not good. Worth a ticket?
> >
> > I don't think so. I guess there is a good reason not to simplify
> > symbolic expressions by default.
>
> I disagree; I'd create one even if nobody wants to fix it at the moment.
> The problem here isn't about simplification -- equal expressions bec
On 03/14/2013 03:34 PM, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> On 2013-03-14, Jan Groenewald wrote:
>> --e89a8f83aa332c3afc04d7e540f8
>> No, the core example is inside a matrix
>
> I don't understand what you mean by this.
>
>> A==B
>> False
>> A.simplify_rational()==B
>> True
>>
>> That is not good.
Hi
No, the core example is inside a matrix
A==B
False
A.simplify_rational()==B
True
That is not good. Worth a ticket?
Regards,
Jan
On 12 March 2013 18:17, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> On 2013-03-12, Jan Groenewald wrote:
> > sage: A=matrix([(x+1)*(x-1)]); B=matrix([x^2-1]);
> > sage: A
