On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 6:26 AM, javier wrote:
> They were listed on the comments. I have upgraded the ticket
> description to make it clearer.
Sorry, I missed that.
I have tested it on a mac and have seen no problems. I'll test it out
on a linux machine now.
>
> Cheers,
> Javier
>
> --
> To
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:52 AM, javier wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Dec 7, 10:39 pm, David Joyner wrote:
>> The following tests fail with sage-4.8.a3 on a 10.6.8 mac:
>>
>> jeeves:sage-4.8.alpha3 wdj$ ./sage -t -force_lib
>> "devel/sage/sage/groups/group.pyx"
>> sage -t -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 11:57 AM, javier wrote:
> Hi Florent and Simon,
>
> many thanks! That makes sense, I really hadn't considered comparing a
> conjugacy class with an object of a different type. Testsuite and all
> test pass on my machine now, so the ticket is ready for review!
The following
Hi Simon,
> On 7 Dez., 10:16, Simon King wrote:
> > But in both cases, it is also assumed that you are using coercion.
> > Hence, when the test "self==None" raises an error or returns a wrong
> > result then it could also be that there is a wrong coercion.
>
> Ouch, sorry, I thought that y
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:58 PM, javier wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 6, 6:55 pm, David Joyner wrote:
>> I guess I am going blind. I don't see a _cmp_
>> inhttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/7886/trac_7886_c...
>> Which line is it?
>
> Oops!
> My bad, forgot to add the new conjugacy_class
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:39 PM, javier wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Dec 6, 6:29 pm, David Joyner wrote:
>>
>> Where is it? Is it in one of the patches posted to the trac ticket?
>
> Yes, it is in trac_7886_conjugacy_classes.patch
I guess I am going blind. I don't see a _cmp_ in
http://trac.sagemat
