On 09/ 9/10 03:32 AM, Tim Daly wrote:
Some of the questions you have about "why lisp" are answered in:
http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/Going+Deep/Expert-to-Expert-Rich-Hickey-and-Brian-Beckman-Inside-Clojure/
which is about Clojure, a more recent lisp although the ideas are
essentially the same i
Some of the questions you have about "why lisp" are answered in:
http://channel9.msdn.com/shows/Going+Deep/Expert-to-Expert-Rich-Hickey-and-Brian-Beckman-Inside-Clojure/
which is about Clojure, a more recent lisp although the ideas are
essentially the same in Common Lisp.
Tim Daly
David Kirkby w
On 09/05/2010 05:23 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 5 September 2010 10:14, Mitesh Patel wrote:
>> On 09/05/2010 03:52 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
>>> I'm quite happy to be that someone who learns Lisp - I'm serious
>>> thinking of buying a book on it. Unfortunately, they tend to be quite
>>> expensive,
On 09/ 2/10 11:41 PM, rjf wrote:
On Sep 2, 2:23 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
On 09/ 2/10 06:10 AM, rjf wrote:
the mathematica syntax parser that I wrote appears to run inside
Maxima, so
you can, if you wish, feed such text to the mma-in-maxima system.
Sorry to sound green, but I barely
On 09/ 6/10 07:37 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Doing it in C was quite attractive to me personally until you pointed
out that lex/yacc would solve the problem.
Oops - you said lex/yacc would not solve the problem.
Dave
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To
On 09/ 6/10 01:40 AM, rjf wrote:
On Sep 5, 2:40 pm, David Kirkby wrote:
It is however very clear there are far more people know Python than
Lisp, so use of Python is more attractive to more developers.
Dave
More people know C than Python. More people use Windows than Linux.
More people
On 5 September 2010 10:14, Mitesh Patel wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 09/05/2010 03:52 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
>> I'm quite happy to be that someone who learns Lisp - I'm serious
>> thinking of buying a book on it. Unfortunately, they tend to be quite
>> expensive, as do books on writing compilers.
>
Hi David,
On 09/05/2010 03:52 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
> I'm quite happy to be that someone who learns Lisp - I'm serious
> thinking of buying a book on it. Unfortunately, they tend to be quite
> expensive, as do books on writing compilers.
Some time ago, I found "Practical Common Lisp" by P. Seib
On 2 September 2010 23:41, rjf wrote:
>> There's no README file in the source code I found of yours, so it's far from
>> obvious to me how I would use it.
> um, I don't know where you looked, but
>
> here is one place..
> http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~fateman/mma1.6/
Adding a README file would hel
On 09/ 2/10 06:10 AM, rjf wrote:
the mathematica syntax parser that I wrote appears to run inside
Maxima, so
you can, if you wish, feed such text to the mma-in-maxima system.
Sorry to sound green, but I barely know Maxima, and do not know Lisp at all.
I do know Mathematica - though I'm certai
On 2 September 2010 04:01, Felix Lawrence wrote:
> I think there's some confusion here. kcrisman seems to be talking
> about allowing the Mathematica interface to parse mathematica output,
> importing it to Sage. Dave seems to be proposing writing something
> that lets Sage run mathematica code
On 1 September 2010 17:45, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 1, 11:55 am, David Kirkby wrote:
>> Has anyone given thought for making Sage read Mathematica syntax? I've
>> seen a recent video from William stating it is NOT an aim of Sage to
>> be clone of any of the 4 M's - in contrast, Octave is a clo
12 matches
Mail list logo
