On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> I may have time next weekend to containerize the buildbot, though no
> promises. It does need quite a lot of disk space (the old one was about 50GB
> iirc) to hold all the build logs and binary builds.
The new machine has 8TB of hard disks in
I may have time next weekend to containerize the buildbot, though no
promises. It does need quite a lot of disk space (the old one was about
50GB iirc) to hold all the build logs and binary builds. Whats the plan for
external networking and secrets?
On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 9:57:43 P
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Harald Schilly
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>> we can't, because there are filesize limits.
>> how about git-lfs ? (which is probably not cheap to use)
>
> I don't think we need any of that, a normal CDN is fine, too. Problem
>
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> we can't, because there are filesize limits.
> how about git-lfs ? (which is probably not cheap to use)
I don't think we need any of that, a normal CDN is fine, too. Problem
with using a commercial one is that the traffic is so expensive.
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Harald Schilly
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 7:39 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> no volunteers to migrate files/build/rsync.sagemath.org... We should
>> just switch to GitHub.
>
> we can't, because there are filesize limits.
how about git-lfs ? (which is probably
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 7:39 PM, William Stein wrote:
> no volunteers to migrate files/build/rsync.sagemath.org... We should
> just switch to GitHub.
we can't, because there are filesize limits.
-- h
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" gr
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:10 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
>>> Yes, both the file server files.sagemath.org and buildbot build.sagemath.org
>>> are down...
>
> I've done what I can and right now
>
>- files.sagemath.org
>- rsync.sagemath.o
On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 12:02:36 PM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 9:04:08 AM UTC, Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>> Somebody killed unauthorized git:// over the weekend... incorrect
>> firewall rule?
>>
>
> It was William, I suppose.
> Actually, disabling
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
>> Yes, both the file server files.sagemath.org and buildbot build.sagemath.org
>> are down...
I've done what I can and right now
- files.sagemath.org
- rsync.sagemath.org
seem to respond to pings. And
- build.sagemath.org doesn'
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 7:24 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
>> Yes, both the file server files.sagemath.org and buildbot build.sagemath.org
>> are down...
>>
>
> I'll check on these when I'm next on campus (probably today).
It turns out the UPS is
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
> Yes, both the file server files.sagemath.org and buildbot build.sagemath.org
> are down...
>
I'll check on these when I'm next on campus (probably today).
William
>
>
> On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 2:25:52 PM UTC+2, leif wrote:
>>
>> Di
Didn't we have that problem previously that OS updates would overwrite
system config (I'm guessing thats what happened).
On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 12:02:36 PM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 9:04:08 AM UTC, Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>> Somebody killed un
On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 9:04:08 AM UTC, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> Somebody killed unauthorized git:// over the weekend... incorrect firewall
> rule?
>
It was William, I suppose.
Actually, disabling anonymous git:// would perhaps help to reduce server
load, without
real functionality p
Somebody killed unauthorized git:// over the weekend... incorrect firewall
rule?
On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 10:52:13 AM UTC+2, Harald Schilly wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Dima Pasechnik > wrote:
> > this really has to be documented properly.
>
> just added to your ticket
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> this really has to be documented properly.
just added to your ticket a comment, repeating it here:
it's not only the git-trac page, but also the "the hard way" page:
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/manual_git.html#the-trac-server
On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 8:16:56 AM UTC, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Harald Schilly
> <> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Jonathan Bober <> wrote:
> >> tracgit://trac.sagemath.org/sage.git (fetch)
> >> tracg...@trac.sagemath.org:sage.g
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Harald Schilly
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Jonathan Bober wrote:
>> tracgit://trac.sagemath.org/sage.git (fetch)
>> tracg...@trac.sagemath.org:sage.git (push)
>
> As a random idea, since several others were also asking me about this:
> Did yo
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016, Harald Schilly wrote:
or maybe this:
git remote add trac2 g...@trac.sagemath.org:sage.git
git fetch trac2
and see if that works.
Works, but then how to checkout tickets after that?
--
Jori Mäntysalo
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Jonathan Bober wrote:
> tracgit://trac.sagemath.org/sage.git (fetch)
> tracg...@trac.sagemath.org:sage.git (push)
As a random idea, since several others were also asking me about this:
Did you try setting both trac remotes to
g...@trac.sagemath.org:sage.gi
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 1:54 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 12:40:23 AM UTC, Jonathan Bober wrote:
>>
>> Is git still down, or do is the problem just that I don't know what I am
>> doing?
>>
>> jb12407@lmfdb5:/data/local/sage/sage-7.3$ git trac checkout 21596
>>
On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 6:18:53 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 1:02:53 AM UTC, John H Palmieri wrote:
>>
>> I'm having this problem with "git trac checkout 21592", for example.
>>
>> A question: how do I identify which version of git-trac is inst
On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 1:02:53 AM UTC, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> I'm having this problem with "git trac checkout 21592", for example.
>
> A question: how do I identify which version of git-trac is installed? Is
> the version actually recorded anywhere in the source code?
>
there is
I'm having this problem with "git trac checkout 21592", for example.
A question: how do I identify which version of git-trac is installed? Is
the version actually recorded anywhere in the source code?
John
On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 5:54:54 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mo
On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 12:40:23 AM UTC, Jonathan Bober wrote:
>
> Is git still down, or do is the problem just that I don't know what I am
> doing?
>
> jb12407@lmfdb5:/data/local/sage/sage-7.3$ git trac checkout 21596
>
Make sure you have the latest `git trac` installed.
There is no
Is git still down, or do is the problem just that I don't know what I am
doing?
jb12407@lmfdb5:/data/local/sage/sage-7.3$ git trac checkout 21596
Loading ticket #21596...
Newly created local branch:
t/21596/matrix_charpoly_algorithm__flint___destroys_the_polynomial_ring_generator
Traceback (most r
25 matches
Mail list logo
