On 2015-03-18 12:40, Mike Zabrocki wrote:
(at least for values less than 15)
I really don't like that defaults would depend on the input size.
Somebody working with small examples might *assume* that the order is in
a given way, and then suddenly his code will break down on larger examples.
-
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
So would it make sense to have an optional parameter sorted=None,
which one could set to 'lex' or 'revlex' to get them in a desired order.
The documentation could warn about the issues you just raised.
If there is a general agreement on this, I could
On 2015-03-18 09:20, Samuel Lelievre wrote:
So would it make sense to have an optional parameter sorted=None,
which one could set to 'lex' or 'revlex' to get them in a desired order.
The documentation could warn about the issues you just raised.
If there is a general agreement on this, I could
I think that for *most* applications the order does not matter, so I
would vote on not sorting by default. If you need sorting, just do it
yourself (or use IntegerListsLex).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from thi
