On Monday, January 26, 2015 at 4:30:38 PM UTC-8, vdelecroix wrote:
>
> Trying (line 59):TestSuite(M).run() # long time (52s on sage.math,
> 2012)
> Expecting nothing
> ok [141.39 s]
>
Doing "%prun TestSuite(M).run()" gives
2311224 function calls (2306683 primitive calls) in 156
On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 at 10:05:02 AM UTC-8, vdelecroix wrote:
>
> Interesting. Note that the :2 () part actually comes
> from hashing...
Why do you think that? According to the profiling, this gets called only
once, has a modest "total" time and a large variation in the "cumulative".
I
Interesting. Note that the :2 () part actually comes
from hashing... as hash is defined by the wonderful
def __hash__(self):
return hash(str(self))
I am not so sure why there is much more call to has than before.
Vincent
2015-01-27 18:23 UTC+01:00, Stefan :
> I ran the same code wit
I ran the same code with cProfile. Here's the output:
perron:sage5 svanzwam$ ./sage/sage speedtest.sage
Sage Version 5.12, Release Date: 2013-10-07
(0, 3, 1, 0, 2, 1)
7193816 function calls (7193814 primitive calls) in 3.425 seconds
Ordered by: standard name
ncalls tottime perca
Hello,
Not sure whether it is related or not. In the file
sage/rings/function_field/function_field.py there are two doctests
that take respectively much shorter and much longer than what is
written. Namely
Trying (line 58):TestSuite(L).run() # long time (8s on sage.math, 2012)
Expecting noth
