> On 23 May 2011 03:05, François wrote:
> > OK I did some analysis on the failure of
> > sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/gsl/interpolation.pyx"
> >
> > A list of point is initialized with:
> > v = [(i + sin(i)/2, i+cos(i^2)) for i in range(10)]
> > then a spline is created:
> > s = spli
On 23 May 2011 03:05, François wrote:
> OK I did some analysis on the failure of
> sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/gsl/interpolation.pyx"
>
> A list of point is initialized with:
> v = [(i + sin(i)/2, i+cos(i^2)) for i in range(10)]
> then a spline is created:
> s = spline(v)
> The failu
And in the other test we actually look at the chi squared distribution for
k=1:
sage: nu = 1
sage: T = RealDistribution('chisquared', nu)
sage: T.get_random_element() # random
0.103230507883
sage: T.distribution_function(0)
0.0
If I am not mistaken
OK I did some analysis on the failure of
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/gsl/interpolation.pyx"
A list of point is initialized with:
v = [(i + sin(i)/2, i+cos(i^2)) for i in range(10)]
then a spline is created:
s = spline(v)
The failure is when we try this:
show(point(v) + plot(s,0,11, h
On 05/20/11 08:40 PM, Francois
wrote:
I created a package of The GNU Scientific library (GSL) 1.15, which was
released a few weeks ago) and put it here.
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/patches/gsl-1.15.spkg
I tried to build sage-4.7.rc3 using this version of gsl rather than the
ol
> I created a package of The GNU Scientific library (GSL) 1.15, which was
> released a few weeks ago) and put it here.
>
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/patches/gsl-1.15.spkg
>
> I tried to build sage-4.7.rc3 using this version of gsl rather than the
> older one in Sage.
>
> But w
