Re: [sage-devel] the ARM port - numerical noise

2012-01-19 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 19/01/2012 20:11, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit : On 2012-01-19 14:46, Julien Puydt wrote: Does there exist a mechanism which allows an spkg to leave some file, where some variables are defined, which will get used for the compilation of packages afterwards? What do you have in mind? We need some

Re: [sage-devel] the ARM port - numerical noise

2012-01-19 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2012-01-19 14:46, Julien Puydt wrote: > Does there exist a mechanism which allows an spkg to leave some file, > where some variables are defined, which will get used for the > compilation of packages afterwards? What do you have in mind? -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@go

Re: [sage-devel] the ARM port - numerical noise

2012-01-19 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Monday, 16 January 2012 22:48:01 UTC+8, Snark wrote: >> >> Le 16/01/2012 15:42, Burcin Erocal a �crit : >> >> > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 04:21:37 -0800 (PST) >> > Dima Pasechnik  wrote: >> >> > >> >> Once again, let me bring up the numer

Re: [sage-devel] the ARM port - numerical noise

2012-01-19 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 19/01/2012 09:15, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : Installing cephes means building static libs and putting appropriate headers somewhere in $SAGE_ROOT/local (cephes is currently only installed on Cygwin, where it provides some missing functionality for complex number support), using parts of its code

Re: [sage-devel] the ARM port - numerical noise

2012-01-19 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Monday, 16 January 2012 22:42:20 UTC+8, Burcin Erocal wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 04:21:37 -0800 (PST) > Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > Once again, let me bring up the numerical noise issue on ARM. > > The problem is that while we pretty much narrowed it down to a > > particular function comp

Re: [sage-devel] the ARM port - numerical noise

2012-01-18 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Monday, 16 January 2012 22:48:01 UTC+8, Snark wrote: > > Le 16/01/2012 15:42, Burcin Erocal a �crit : > > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 04:21:37 -0800 (PST) > > Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > >> Once again, let me bring up the numerical noise issue on ARM. > >> The problem is that while we pretty much n

Re: [sage-devel] the ARM port - numerical noise

2012-01-18 Thread Dima Pasechnik
OK, I've opened #12320 : make cephes installable on ARMs. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-deve

Re: [sage-devel] the ARM port - numerical noise

2012-01-16 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 16/01/2012 15:42, Burcin Erocal a écrit : On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 04:21:37 -0800 (PST) Dima Pasechnik wrote: Once again, let me bring up the numerical noise issue on ARM. The problem is that while we pretty much narrowed it down to a particular function computing the log of the gamma-function,

Re: [sage-devel] the ARM port - numerical noise

2012-01-16 Thread Burcin Erocal
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 04:21:37 -0800 (PST) Dima Pasechnik wrote: > Once again, let me bring up the numerical noise issue on ARM. > The problem is that while we pretty much narrowed it down to a > particular function computing the log of the gamma-function, > lgammal, in elibc, an implementation of

[sage-devel] the ARM port - numerical noise

2012-01-16 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Once again, let me bring up the numerical noise issue on ARM. The problem is that while we pretty much narrowed it down to a particular function computing the log of the gamma-function, lgammal, in elibc, an implementation of libc used on Ubuntu 11.10 (on ARM, at least), the chances that the ups