Am Donnerstag, 20. Oktober 2016 13:05:59 UTC+2 schrieb Johan S. R. Nielsen:
>
> > Yes, but there are no links. Or do you have them?
>
> True, they are not links. It would be nice if they were, though
> personally I like that what is printed is the actual module name that I
> should type in foll
> Yes, but there are no links. Or do you have them?
True, they are not links. It would be nice if they were, though
personally I like that what is printed is the actual module name that I
should type in followed by ? to see its doc. That's probably how I would
do it even if it was a link, and IMH
Yes, but there are no links. Or do you have them?
(I admit, I made a mistake: the text is the same, contrary what I wrote.
Although I'm not sure that showing just the docstring of the class is best
possible: I recently used automethod, and this documentation is not
shown...)
Martin
Am Donne
I don't understand -- aren't you getting the full documentation, as in this
page:
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/combinat/sage/combinat/posets/__init__.html#sage-combinat-posets
At least, on my machine it prints the exact same information.
Best,
Johan
'Martin R' via sage-devel write
As you may know, using https://github.com/sagemath/sage-shell-mode, working
with sage in emacs is a very enjoyable pastime.
In particular, typing at the sage prompt
sage: sage.combinat.posets?
opens a new frame and displays the documentation of sage.combinat.posets
there. However, to my dismay
