[sage-devel] singular crash

Dear all, I just set up a patchbot but two tests related to singular fail. The singular it uses was compiled from source. See the patchbot report at https://patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket/32859/ sage -t --long --warn-long 42.4 --random-seed=24651699140802493978117085271929917492 src/sage/interfa

Re: [sage-devel] Singular rpm packages on Fedora

On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 12:54 PM Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-08-18 at 17:34 +0900, Kazuyoshi Furutaka wrote: > > > > But there exists no fedora.txt file in sage pkgs directory. > > > > $ ls build/pkgs/singular/distros/ > > > conda.txt freebsd.txt macports.txt repology.txt > > > d

Re: [sage-devel] Singular rpm packages on Fedora

On Wed, 2021-08-18 at 17:34 +0900, Kazuyoshi Furutaka wrote: > > But there exists no fedora.txt file in sage pkgs directory. > > $ ls build/pkgs/singular/distros/ > > conda.txt freebsd.txt macports.txt repology.txt > > debian.txt homebrew.txt nix.txt > > > > Isn't it possible to use them

[sage-devel] Singular rpm packages on Fedora

Hi... I happened to find Singular-related rpm packages on my Fedora-34 system. $ dnf list \*[sS]ingular\* > Fedora 34 - x86_64 13 kB/s | 6.6 kB > 00:00 > Fedora 34 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_641.7 kB/s | 989 B > 00:00 > Fedora Modular 34 - x86_64

Re: [sage-devel] Singular 4.1.1

You might want to look at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24735 François > On 27/04/2018, at 10:11, Brent W. Baccala wrote: > > Hi - > > Has anybody worked on porting Singular 4.1.1 to Sage? (4.1.1 was released in > February; 4.1.1p2 was released on Monday) > > I'm having problems loading

[sage-devel] Singular 4.1.1

Hi - Has anybody worked on porting Singular 4.1.1 to Sage? (4.1.1 was released in February; 4.1.1p2 was released on Monday) I'm having problems loading "brillnoether.lib" into the Singular 4.1.0p3 that's current with Sage develop (just try to load it if you want to see it fail), so I thought

[sage-devel] Singular quotient rings in doctests

Hi! I am currently trying to create some doc tests, that involve computations by Singular in quotients of polynomial rings. I observe that the results in an interactive session differ from those obtained during the tests. It seems to me that the elements are automatically put into normal form wrt.

[sage-devel] Singular segfault in tests on Docker

Hi, I've been trying for a while to get a patchbot up and running in the Docker container for Sage, and keep running into a problem that I seem to only be getting in a container, with the two (likely related) test failures in the log I pasted below. It's strange because if I fire up a fresh conta

[sage-devel] Singular error on startup

Hi I've repackaged sage 7.5.1 binary for 14.04 for the PPA, and get this on startup: 0 jan@muizenberg:~$sage ┌┐ │ SageMath version 7.5.1, Release Date: 2017-01-15 │ │ Type "notebook()" for the browser-based note

[sage-devel] singular update and interreduced_basis

With singular 4 on sage I have now: sage: P. = PolynomialRing(QQ,3, order='lex') sage: toto=ideal([7*a - 420*c^3 + 158*c^2 + 8*c - 7, 7*b + 210*c^3 - 79*c^2 + 3*c, 84*c^4 - 40*c^3 + c^2 + c]) sage: toto.interreduced_basis? sage: g=toto.interreduced_basis() sage: g[0].lc() 7 sage: toto.base_ring()

[sage-devel] Singular "share" files

+1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit

[sage-devel] Singular "share" files

Dear all, We currently repackage singular so merge the source code and help files into a single archive (and renaming directories). Should we stop doing so by creating a "singular_share" package for the latter files? Best, JPF -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo

Re: [sage-devel] Singular random doctest failure?

On 2015-08-18 10:07, Jori Mäntysalo wrote: Failed example: singular.interrupt(timeout=3) # sometimes very slow (up to 60s on This is fixed by #10476. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

[sage-devel] Singular random doctest failure?

I took the patch from http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18936 , compiled and ran long tests successfully. Then I installed dot2tex and ran short tests, and got sage -t --warn-long 32.0 src/sage/interfaces/expect.py ** File "src/s

Re: [sage-devel] SIngular version

On 05/14/15 09:00, John Cremona wrote: Is anyone planning to update the version of Singular used by Sage? We appear to use 3.1.7 which is not listed at http://www.singular.uni-kl.de/index.php/news.html but 3.1.6 was released in 2012, there were two releases in 2014 and the current one is 4.0.2 r

[sage-devel] SIngular version

Is anyone planning to update the version of Singular used by Sage? We appear to use 3.1.7 which is not listed at http://www.singular.uni-kl.de/index.php/news.html but 3.1.6 was released in 2012, there were two releases in 2014 and the current one is 4.0.2 released on 2015-03-05. I'm asking becaus

[sage-devel] singular 4.0.1 upgrade: cython compile for 'plural' peeks wrong lib

I'm getting a strange cython behaviour when compiling u/jakobkroeker/ticket.17254.squashed , cython tries to pick -lsingular instead of -lSingular when compiling plur

Re: [sage-devel] Singular upgrade plans?

> > Singular 4-0-0 is the result of that big refactoring effort, right? > yes, partly. The refactoring still continues. Olexandr Motsak told be that the released version is a beta and he had no idea about a date for the official release. We'll see if the team is brave enough for due major cha

Re: [sage-devel] singular help system broken.

On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Kannappan Sampath wrote: > Hello group: > > At the moment, the help system for singular is broken: > >> help ring; > > // ** Could not get IdxFile. > > // ** Either set environment variable SINGULAR_IDX_FILE to IdxFile, > > // ** or make sure that IdxFile is at > /U

[sage-devel] singular help system broken.

Hello group: At the moment, the help system for singular is broken: > help ring; // ** Could not get IdxFile. // ** Either set environment variable SINGULAR_IDX_FILE to IdxFile, // ** or make sure that IdxFile is at /Users/apple/sage/local/doc/singular.idx ? cannot open `help.cnf` // ** D

Re: [sage-devel] Singular upgrade plans?

Singular 4-0-0 is the result of that big refactoring effort, right? I guess upgrading to that would take some time. Indeed, it might be a good idea to do it with 1-2 Singular develops at hand to ask questions. On Wednesday 07 May 2014 05:27:25 kroe...@uni-math.gwdg.de wrote: > yes, that's true.

Re: [sage-devel] Singular upgrade plans?

yes, that's true. Singular 4-0-0 seems not officially released yet. At least some new tarballs appeared on their file server: http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/ftp/pub/Math/Singular/SOURCES/4-0-0/ Personally I'm using their development branch (spielwiese) on github (https://github.com/Singular/Sour

Re: [sage-devel] Singular upgrade plans?

On Wednesday, May 7, 2014 1:51:41 PM UTC+2, Martin Albrecht wrote: > > Hi, > > which version of Singular should be upgrade to? I see that 3-1-6 is the > most > recent one and this seems to be shipped with Sage. What am I missing? > > I guess 4-0-0? Not sure if that was officially released and

Re: [sage-devel] Singular upgrade plans?

Hi, which version of Singular should be upgrade to? I see that 3-1-6 is the most recent one and this seems to be shipped with Sage. What am I missing? Cheers, Martin On Wednesday 07 May 2014 04:41:18 kroe...@uni-math.gwdg.de wrote: > Hello, > > > I would like to switch with our project in alg

[sage-devel] Singular upgrade plans?

Hello, I would like to switch with our project in algebraic geometry (resolution of singularities using Lipman's approach) from Singular to Sage ( the main reason is that Python is superior in comparison to Singular's interpreter language ) However, the project depends on recent bug-fixes in Si

[sage-devel] Singular bug at #15710

Hello, the bug report http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15710 seems to be a problem with the Singular library. Could somebody who knows about Singular try to reproduce this within Singular itself and report it upstream? Jeroen. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go

[sage-devel] singular interface: issue for univariate polynomial rings?

Hello, I'm hitting an issue with the singular interface using sage 5.7 Could someone confirm this for the recent development version ( I have some troubles to build it ) ? Here is the example showing an issue for univariate rings: from sage.libs.singular.function import singular_function, lib

Re: [sage-devel] Singular fails to build in Sage 5.9

On 05/05/13 21:12, Wai Yan Pong wrote: > Hum I see what you are saying. Well my case is a bit tricky but I think > I'm not alone. I am using Archlinux, so there is not g++ separately. And > gcc decides whether the program as a C or C++ program in the following way. > > |gcc file.C # uppercase .C (

Re: [sage-devel] Singular fails to build in Sage 5.9

Hum I see what you are saying. Well my case is a bit tricky but I think I'm not alone. I am using Archlinux, so there is not g++ separately. And gcc decides whether the program as a C or C++ program in the following way. gcc file.C # uppercase .C (or .cpp) will process as C++ gcc file.c # lowercas

Re: [sage-devel] Singular fails to build in Sage 5.9

On 05/05/13 19:32, Pong wrote: > Looking for help in compiling SAGE 5.9 > > I encountered an error in buliding Singular-3-1-5.p7 > > I suspect the following may be the relevant part of the log file > > In file included from ../kernel/si_gmp.h:4:0, > from ../kernel/structs.h:15,

[sage-devel] Singular fails to start standalone

Hi On Ubuntu 12.04.2 with sage 5.7 from the PPA, I get this: 0 jan@muizenberg:~$/usr/lib/sagemath/local/bin/Singular /usr/lib/sagemath/local/bin/Singular: error while loading shared libraries: libntl.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory 0 jan@muizenberg:~$locate libntl

Re: [sage-devel] singular error

On 2012-09-07 16:48, John Cremona wrote: > Thanks -- I have not seen 5.4.beta0 announced, but will get hold of it. It hasn't been released yet, but it's essentially stable. You can go ahead and use it, but keep in mind you won't have an official version and you should not report bugs for it. --

Re: [sage-devel] singular error

Thanks -- I have not seen 5.4.beta0 announced, but will get hold of it. John On 7 September 2012 14:51, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2012-09-07 15:24, John Cremona wrote: >> The code below causes a singular error, in 5.1 and 5.2 it's >> "RuntimeError: zz_pContext: p must be > 1" while in 5.3.rc1 i

Re: [sage-devel] singular error

On 2012-09-07 15:24, John Cremona wrote: > The code below causes a singular error, in 5.1 and 5.2 it's > "RuntimeError: zz_pContext: p must be > 1" while in 5.3.rc1 it's > "RuntimeError: Floating point exception". Has this been seen before, > or is a new ticket required? It seems to be fixed by #

[sage-devel] singular error

The code below causes a singular error, in 5.1 and 5.2 it's "RuntimeError: zz_pContext: p must be > 1" while in 5.3.rc1 it's "RuntimeError: Floating point exception". Has this been seen before, or is a new ticket required? John PS If you can tell what the computation is about, you get a prize.

[sage-devel] Singular and Symmetric don't build on Ubuntu Oneiric (11.10)

I installed the current alpha version of Ubuntu Oneiric (11.10) into a virtual machine to see if Sage builds on it. Unfortunately, it doesn't. My virtual machine is a 32-bit machine with 1 gigabyte of RAM, and uses gcc 4.6.1. Most of Sage 4.7.2.alpha2 built with no problem, but Singular and Symmet

Re: [sage-devel] Singular in 4.6.2.alpha4 doesn't build on Ubuntu 11.04 alpha 2

> I thought I would try to see if Sage builds in the upcoming version of > Ubuntu, which is still early in the development stages but I think the > compilers and other basic system stuff are stable. But there's some kind > of linker error: > > ../kernel/libkernel.a(mod_raw.o): In function `dynl_op

[sage-devel] Singular in 4.6.2.alpha4 doesn't build on Ubuntu 11.04 alpha 2

I thought I would try to see if Sage builds in the upcoming version of Ubuntu, which is still early in the development stages but I think the compilers and other basic system stuff are stable. But there's some kind of linker error: ../kernel/libkernel.a(mod_raw.o): In function `dynl_open': /home/f

Re: [sage-devel] Singular failure #9733 is not really a fix

> > I am taking a look at this shortly. I don't have hardware on which I can > > push parallel make so far. There are some messages I haven't seen before > > in a parallel make of singular I must say. This particular failure > > should be easy but there may be more after it. > > > > Francois > >

Re: [sage-devel] Singular failure #9733 is not really a fix

On 17 September 2010 09:18, Mitesh Patel wrote: > Thanks for reporting this at #9733. > > Please note that this version is an unofficial, unreleased, "trial" > 4.6.alpha1 that I've been testing.  It is definitely not the "final" > version. I was aware of that, but it seemed worth reporting anywa

Re: [sage-devel] Singular failure #9733 is not really a fix

On 17 September 2010 10:29, François Bissey wrote: >> On 09/17/2010 02:25 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: >> > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9733 >> > >> > is supposed to fix "Parallel build of Singular 3-1-1-4-package fails in >> > rare case" >> > >> > I just downloaded the sage-4.6.alpha

Re: [sage-devel] Singular failure #9733 is not really a fix

> On 09/17/2010 02:25 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9733 > > > > is supposed to fix "Parallel build of Singular 3-1-1-4-package fails in > > rare case" > > > > I just downloaded the sage-4.6.alpha1.tar file (Mihesh gave a hint where > > it was), and it

Re: [sage-devel] Singular failure #9733 is not really a fix

On 09/17/2010 02:25 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9733 > > is supposed to fix "Parallel build of Singular 3-1-1-4-package fails in > rare case" > > I just downloaded the sage-4.6.alpha1.tar file (Mihesh gave a hint where > it was), and it failed on buildi

[sage-devel] Singular failure #9733 is not really a fix

http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9733 is supposed to fix "Parallel build of Singular 3-1-1-4-package fails in rare case" I just downloaded the sage-4.6.alpha1.tar file (Mihesh gave a hint where it was), and it failed on building Singular, despite this patch was committed. see below.

[sage-devel] Singular without corrupted patches requires review

If anyone would care to have a look at my changes to Singular and review it, I would appreciate it. This sorts out the issue of one patch overwriting another. I've built it on the following systems and have attached compressed logs of the relevant bits of the build to the ticket, so you can see

[sage-devel] singular believes the Sun C++ compiler is broken.

Using * Solaris 10 update 7 on SPARC * sage-4.1.2.alpha2 * Sun Studio 12.1 * An updated configure script to allow the Sun compiler to be used (#7021) CC was set to the Sun C compiler, and CXX to the Sun C++ compiler. The singular configure script does not believe the Sun C+

[sage-devel] singular-3-1-0-4-20090818.spkg install failure on Sage 4.1.2.alpha0 + Solaris on T2

Hi folks, In Sage 4.1.2.alpha0, the singular-3-1-0-4-20090818.spkg package consistently fails to install itself on SPARC Solaris on the machine t2.math. The relevant error message snippet is: ** for file in *.h; do \ ../.././install-sh -c $file /scratch/mvngu/sage-4.1.2.alpha0/local/include/

[sage-devel] Singular 3.1.0.4 installs OK on T2 but gives "Invalid argument" at the end

Hi folks, Ticket #6476 http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6476 upgrades Singular to version 3-1-0-4. You can find the new spkg at http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/malb/spkgs/singular-3-1-0-4-20090818.spkg or http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mvngu/patch/singular-3-1-0-4-2009081

[sage-devel] Singular and Sage

Hi there, as mentioned earlier I am visiting the Singular team this week in Kaiserslautern. On the technical side we worked on - updating to Singular 3-1-04 where it was very valuable to have both Sage and Singular developers within shouting distance, - updating to PolyBoRi 0.6 which wouldn

[sage-devel] Singular looks in the wrong directory for install-sh

I just noticed that some singular header files were not installed, despite the installation of singular having gone *appeared* to gone OK (#SAGE_HOME/spkg/installed/singular-3-1-0-2-20090620 exists) On closer inspection, I see this error: make[1]: Entering directory `/export/home/drkirkby/sa

[sage-devel] singular discussion audio

http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/tmp/singular_discussion.mp3 -- William Stein Associate Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubs

[sage-devel] Singular 3-1-0?

Hi! When will Singular 3-1-0 be in Sage? I have a program parts of which would not work with Singular 3-0-4. So, how can I test the singular version? sage: singular.version() fails with an error (both on sage.math and on my machine). Cheers, Simon --~--~-~--~~~--

[sage-devel] Singular bugs: #1703, #1705 on trac.sagemath.org, gcc 4.3 compilation

Hello Singular team, we came across two bugs and the gcc 4.3 compilation issue in the latest Singular code basis that we ship with Sage 2.9.3. The first bug is #1703: one mpz is leaked in longrat.cc triggered by linear_code.py See: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1703 Valgrind repor

[sage-devel] singular factorize *slow*

Hi, I've been noticing that singular's factoring is grotesquely slow at times. What's really strange is that the speed fluctuates wildly. I've observed this speed fluctuation other places in singular as well. I found http://www.sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/872 and thought it might be that,

[sage-devel] Singular' License

Hi everybody, Singular 3-0-4 is about to be released and this release is going to have an updated license: Singular is now GPL v2 or v3. This is not what we've hoped for (v2 or later) but at least we are good for now. Martin - SINGULAR version 3-0-4

[sage-devel] singular build issue

Hi Paul, It looks like maybe there is an issue with the system-wide boost you have installed. Do you have the boost system-wide package installed? It looks like maybe Singular is picking that up, but failing to build against it correctly. It's not needed for Sage, and I may change the Singula

[sage-devel] singular gcd slow-down

Dear Hans and sage-devel readers, As I wrote on sage-devel a bit earlier, I had some polynomials that were causing singular gcd to slow down dramatically. I had thought this was inconsistent, but upon more investigation it seems very consistent (on two different computers). Here's some singu

[sage-devel] singular efficiency questions

Hi, I'm working on some computations with multi-variable polynomials over QQ. I'm finding some very weird performance characteristics. For instance, I have two polynomials which I want to divide one by the other and have an element of the fraction field. This requires computing a gcd (which

[sage-devel] Singular compilation error. File format not recognized???

I building SAGE in a FC7 chroot jail in FC4. Everything went fine until Singular Singular has problems with ndbm.dl_o. What is ndbm.dl_o??? Michel ==Error message make[3]: Entering directory `/root/sage-2.6/spkg/build/ singular-3-0-2-20070

[sage-devel] Singular compilation error. File format not recognized???

I building SAGE in a FC7 chroot jail in FC4. Everything went fine until Singular Singular has problems with ndbm.dl_o. What is ndbm.dl_o??? Michel ==Error message make[3]: Entering directory `/root/sage-2.6/spkg/build/ singular-3-0-2-20070

[sage-devel] Singular compilation error. File format not recognized???

I building SAGE in a FC7 chroot jail in FC4. Everything went fine until Singular Singular has problems with ndbm.dl_o. What is ndbm.dl_o??? Michel ==Error message make[3]: Entering directory `/root/sage-2.6/spkg/build/ singular-3-0-2-20070

[sage-devel] singular-3.0.2-20070506-2226 compile failure on cygwin

Hello, Latest package is at http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/malb/pkgs/singular-3-0-2-20070506-2226.spkg There are two small problem: There are some garbage characters at line 2 in Singular/Makefile.in. delete those. Also: change the ix86-Win directive in Singular/Makefile.in to something

[sage-devel] singular

Hi, The Singular guy Hans Schonemann came up to me at the workshop and introduced himself. He then said, "person XXX (name forgotten) can't install Singular on his OS X laptop. However, he was able to install the Singular the comes as a component of SAGE. What change did you make so the bui