Re: [sage-devel] sage-on-gentoo status

2011-01-21 Thread Martin Albrecht
> It has been very instructive and Georg was very helpful (he really got us > building polybori on his own - no small feat). Of all the things I have > seen during the month I will only mention the strange things about > singular. There are 5 libraries that ship with the singular executable > (befo

Re: [sage-devel] sage-on-gentoo status

2011-01-21 Thread François Bissey
> Hello! > > On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 22:58:34 +1300 > > François Bissey wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Since I am back to speed I think it is time I posted an update > > on the state of sage-on-gentoo. > > I released sage-4.6.1 ebuilds in the hour after the release > > was announced. That was made po

Re: [sage-devel] sage-on-gentoo status

2011-01-21 Thread v_2e
Hello! On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 22:58:34 +1300 François Bissey wrote: > Hi all, > > Since I am back to speed I think it is time I posted an update > on the state of sage-on-gentoo. > I released sage-4.6.1 ebuilds in the hour after the release > was announced. That was made possible by the fact tha

[sage-devel] sage-on-gentoo status

2011-01-21 Thread François Bissey
Hi all, Since I am back to speed I think it is time I posted an update on the state of sage-on-gentoo. I released sage-4.6.1 ebuilds in the hour after the release was announced. That was made possible by the fact that I have started to make ebuilds for alpha and rc releases. 4.6.1 is in very good

Re: [sage-devel] sage-on-gentoo status at version 4.4.4

2010-06-29 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 06/29/10 01:26 PM, Martin Albrecht wrote: I suspect the ONLY sensible way to do that would be to drop in new Singular, delete all record of all the patches to singular package, and create new patches as and when needed. You suspect wrong. A new Singular SPKG is available in the ticket I refe

Re: Re: [sage-devel] sage-on-gentoo status at version 4.4.4

2010-06-29 Thread Martin Albrecht
> I suspect the ONLY sensible way to do that would be to drop in new > Singular, delete all record of all the patches to singular package, and > create new patches as and when needed. You suspect wrong. A new Singular SPKG is available in the ticket I referenced in this thread which takes care of

Re: [sage-devel] sage-on-gentoo status at version 4.4.4

2010-06-29 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 06/29/10 12:03 PM, François Bissey wrote: Hi all, this message is cross-posted between the gentoo-science and sage-devel mailing lists. So this is sage-4.4.4 and we have come a long way. sage-on-gentoo is now usable for the majority of people and can be used to test development ideas. Good

Re: [sage-devel] sage-on-gentoo status at version 4.4.4

2010-06-29 Thread François Bissey
> > Outstanding issues: > > -singular: we really wish sage would move to the latest upstream. > > When we tried to update the last time we found a bug (or change of > behaviour) in the most recent Singular release: > > cf. http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8059 > > It is likely that ups

Re: [sage-devel] sage-on-gentoo status at version 4.4.4

2010-06-29 Thread Martin Albrecht
> Outstanding issues: > -singular: we really wish sage would move to the latest upstream. When we tried to update the last time we found a bug (or change of behaviour) in the most recent Singular release: cf. http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8059 It is likely that upstream fixed it by

[sage-devel] sage-on-gentoo status at version 4.4.4

2010-06-29 Thread François Bissey
Hi all, this message is cross-posted between the gentoo-science and sage-devel mailing lists. So this is sage-4.4.4 and we have come a long way. sage-on-gentoo is now usable for the majority of people and can be used to test development ideas. We have a page where we list our current issues: htt