> On Aug 11, 2015, at 07:17, Daniel Krenn wrote:
>
> On 2015-08-11 12:00, Sébastien Labbé wrote:
>> Can you confirm that you get the same regression as I do?
>>
>> Sébastien
>>
>> With sage 6.8:
>>
>> $ sage nbruin.sage
>> Time: CPU 2.48 s, Wall: 2.49 s
>> Time: CPU 2.13 s, Wall: 2.16 s
>> Ti
> Cannot confirm this:
>
Okay, thanks for checking! So the hypothesis now is that it is due to an
improvement from #14058 which was applied on my sage-6.8. Thanksfully!
Sébastien
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe
On 2015-08-11 12:00, Sébastien Labbé wrote:
Can you confirm that you get the same regression as I do?
Sébastien
With sage 6.8:
$ sage nbruin.sage
Time: CPU 2.48 s, Wall: 2.49 s
Time: CPU 2.13 s, Wall: 2.16 s
Time: CPU 33.20 s, Wall: 34.11 s
With sage 6.9.beta1:
$ sage nbruin.sage
Time: CPU 7
Hello,
I think that we should seriously start a regression test suite as this
is not the first time!
Does anybody already started something? Has suggestion?
Regression tests might even be included in the patchbot.
Vincent
On 11/08/15 12:00, Sébastien Labbé wrote:
Can you confirm that you g
Can you confirm that you get the same regression as I do?
Sébastien
With sage 6.8:
$ sage nbruin.sage
Time: CPU 2.48 s, Wall: 2.49 s
Time: CPU 2.13 s, Wall: 2.16 s
Time: CPU 33.20 s, Wall: 34.11 s
With sage 6.9.beta1:
$ sage nbruin.sage
Time: CPU 7.83 s, Wall: 8.07 s
Time: CPU 8.07 s, Wall: 8
