Re: [sage-devel] pynac maintainership

2021-01-19 Thread Eric Gourgoulhon
Le lundi 18 janvier 2021 à 22:57:31 UTC+1, kcrisman a écrit : > Thanks for all your work on this over the years, Ralf, it has been greatly > appreciated! > > Yes, many thanks! Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe

Re: [sage-devel] pynac maintainership

2021-01-18 Thread kcrisman
Thanks for all your work on this over the years, Ralf, it has been greatly appreciated! Note also that Matthias noted this at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31092 I think that for the short term bringing it under sagemath makes sense, long term #31092 goal may be best with the change to maki

Re: [sage-devel] pynac maintainership

2021-01-09 Thread Ralf Stephan
Dima, this is great. Yes, Pynac is Sage-specific and so could live under sagemath. The division is purely historic if I'm not mstaken. On Saturday, January 9, 2021 at 11:20:01 AM UTC+1 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi Ralf, > I accepted the invite - in case there is need for someone around, for > ba

Re: [sage-devel] pynac maintainership

2021-01-09 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Hi Ralf, I accepted the invite - in case there is need for someone around, for basic maintenance and admin purposes. Is Sage the main downstream of pynac? We can bring it under Sagemath org then. Dima On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 9:36 AM Ralf Stephan wrote: > > Dear all, > it is now clear to me I won't

[sage-devel] pynac maintainership

2021-01-09 Thread Ralf Stephan
Dear all, it is now clear to me I won't have spare time to do even basic maintenance of https://github.com/pynac/pynac. Motivation-wise I'm now also completely in biocuration and Wikidata. Please come up with a new maintainer, Burcin and I are listed as members of https://github.com/pynac so I c