On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 09:04:51PM +0200, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 05/22/2013 06:58 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> >An answer is that graphviz is often already installed on the system.
> Really? Are there any Linux distributions which come with graphviz
> installed?
Most likely not on a vanilla
On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 9:58:56 AM UTC-7, Nicolas M. Thiéry wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 09:13:09AM -0700, kcrisman wrote:
> > A standard package which is only useful in the presence of an
> optional
> > package doesn't make sense to me.
>
> It simplifies our users's life,
On 05/22/2013 06:58 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
An answer is that graphviz is often already installed on the system.
Really? Are there any Linux distributions which come with graphviz
installed?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:39:36AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
> I installed the dot2tex package on https://cloud.sagemath.com, but
> when I try to actually use it with this example:
>
> g = sage.categories.category.category_graph()
> g.set_latex_options(format="dot2tex")
> view(g, pdflatex=True,
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery
wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 09:13:09AM -0700, kcrisman wrote:
>> A standard package which is only useful in the presence of an optional
>> package doesn't make sense to me.
>
> It simplifies our users's life, and that is useful! Als
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 09:13:09AM -0700, kcrisman wrote:
> A standard package which is only useful in the presence of an optional
> package doesn't make sense to me.
It simplifies our users's life, and that is useful! Also it simplifies
*my* life: I am tired, e.g. during Sage Days, of h
On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 10:55:12 AM UTC-4, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 05/22/2013 04:32 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> > - [X] No, keep it as optional
>
> A standard package which is only useful in the presence of an optional
> package doesn't make sense to me.
>
> And I fail to see why i
On 05/22/2013 04:32 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
- [X] No, keep it as optional
A standard package which is only useful in the presence of an optional
package doesn't make sense to me.
And I fail to see why installing both graphviz and dot2tex is more
difficult than just installing dot2tex (
Dear Sage developers,
This is a poll for making dot2tex a standard spkg.
- [ ] Yes, make dot2tex a standard spkg
- [ ] No, keep it as optional
Description of dot2tex
--
dot2tex [1] is a small pure python module (5000 lines), whose purpose
is to give graphs generated
