On 11 May 2018 at 17:17, John Cremona wrote:
>
>
> The patchbot David Loeffler and I run in Warwick is on a machine which has
> Magma on it.
>
> John
>
I'd be grateful if someone could explain how to configure the patchbot to
run the Magma optional doctests -- I couldn't find this in the patchbot
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 5:11 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 7:37 AM Erik Bray wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 7:37 PM, Jeroen Demeyer
>> wrote:
>> > On 2018-05-10 17:20, Thierry wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Run more patchbots, with various combinations of optional packages
>> >>
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 05:17:16PM +0100, John Cremona wrote:
> On 11 May 2018 at 16:11, William Stein wrote:
>
> >
> > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 7:37 AM Erik Bray wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 7:37 PM, Jeroen Demeyer
> >> wrote:
> >> > On 2018-05-10 17:20, Thierry wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >
On 11 May 2018 at 16:11, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 7:37 AM Erik Bray wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 7:37 PM, Jeroen Demeyer
>> wrote:
>> > On 2018-05-10 17:20, Thierry wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Run more patchbots, with various combinations of optional packages
>> >> include
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 7:37 AM Erik Bray wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 7:37 PM, Jeroen Demeyer
> wrote:
> > On 2018-05-10 17:20, Thierry wrote:
> >>
> >> Run more patchbots, with various combinations of optional packages
> >> included.
> >
> >
> > -1
> >
> > That would more the problem more
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 7:37 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2018-05-10 17:20, Thierry wrote:
>>
>> Run more patchbots, with various combinations of optional packages
>> included.
>
>
> -1
>
> That would more the problem more visible at best, but it wouldn't *solve*
> anything.
Considering that op
As far as I remember, no. But I may be mistaken.
Am Donnerstag, 10. Mai 2018 21:00:12 UTC+2 schrieb Jeroen Demeyer:
>
> On 2018-05-10 20:40, 'Martin R' via sage-devel wrote:
> > If there would have been a patchbot running the FriCAS doctests back
> then
>
> There most likely was such a patchbot
On Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 7:58:54 PM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2018-05-10 20:53, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > this would at least prevent tickets like #20382 from getting positive
> > reviews...
>
> Some of the test failures were actually reported by patchbots, see for
> example:
>
On 2018-05-10 20:40, 'Martin R' via sage-devel wrote:
If there would have been a patchbot running the FriCAS doctests back then
There most likely was such a patchbot and it didn't help.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubsc
On 2018-05-10 20:53, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
this would at least prevent tickets like #20382 from getting positive
reviews...
Some of the test failures were actually reported by patchbots, see for
example:
https://patchbot.sagemath.org/log/20382/Ubuntu/16.04/x86_64/4.4.0-119-generic/quasar/201
On Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 6:38:01 PM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2018-05-10 17:20, Thierry wrote:
> > Run more patchbots, with various combinations of optional packages
> > included.
>
> -1
>
> That would more the problem more visible at best, but it wouldn't
> *solve* anything.
Taken to the extreme, we should get rid of doctests altogether, since they
don't solve anything :-)
Seriously, at least the FriCAS interface was broken several times because
of trivial modifications. If there would have been a patchbot running the
FriCAS doctests back then, this would have bee
On 2018-05-10 17:20, Thierry wrote:
Run more patchbots, with various combinations of optional packages
included.
-1
That would more the problem more visible at best, but it wouldn't
*solve* anything.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel"
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 04:35:36PM +0100, John Cremona wrote:
> On 10 May 2018 at 16:20, Thierry wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 04:41:39PM +0200, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > Probably because of #20382 a lot of optional doctests now do not pass
> > > anym
On 10 May 2018 at 16:20, Thierry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 04:41:39PM +0200, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Probably because of #20382 a lot of optional doctests now do not pass
> > anymore... I found very annoying that very often tickets break
> > optional packages
Hi,
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 04:41:39PM +0200, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Probably because of #20382 a lot of optional doctests now do not pass
> anymore... I found very annoying that very often tickets break
> optional packages. Does anybody has ideas to make that happen less often?
Dear all,
Probably because of #20382 a lot of optional doctests now do not pass
anymore... I found very annoying that very often tickets break
optional packages. Does anybody has ideas to make that happen less often?
Best
Vincent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go
17 matches
Mail list logo
