Re: [sage-devel] number_of_partitions

2012-09-21 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
Hey > In the long run I definitely vote for option 1, with > sage.combinat.partitions.number_of_partitions pointing at any time to > whatever implementation is fastest. I am also all fine with option 1 > in the short run if the user gets a useful error message when passing > extra options; s

Re: [sage-devel] number_of_partitions

2012-09-21 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 07:25:42PM -0700, Andrew Mathas wrote: >Please let me know which of the following options you prefer: > 1. deprecate the options to number_of_partitions and have the function in >the global namespace point directly to >sage.combinat.partitions.number_

[sage-devel] number_of_partitions

2012-09-20 Thread Andrew Mathas
Among other things, the patch #13072cleans up sage.combinat.partition. I would like some input as to should happen to the function number_of_partitions. Arguably, if you want to compute the number of partitions of some integer in sage then you s

[sage-devel] number_of_partitions

2007-10-14 Thread William Stein
Hi Jon, Your number_of_partitions code is in the current sage-2.8.7.rc1, and it works on all but one machine we tested in on. Unfortunately -- JUST AS YOU SUSPECTED -- it doens't work on PPC OS X. It runs, but gives wrong answers. Any ideas how to fix your code to still work on OS X PPC, even