On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Sergey Bochkanov <
sergey.bochka...@alglib.net> wrote:
> correction to my previous message:
>
> > It leads to unnecessary allocation of temporaries and some
> > performance penalty (about 25-30% for 128-bit precision).
>
> Sorry, I made a mistake when es
correction to my previous message:
> It leads to unnecessary allocation of temporaries and some
> performance penalty (about 25-30% for 128-bit precision).
Sorry, I made a mistake when estimating MPLAKACK performance. "25-30%"
are ALGLIB's, not MPLAPACK's.
I've never measured MPLAPAC
Hello, Jason.
You wrote 21 мая 2010 г., 3:48:03:
> A while ago someone talked about incorporating ALGLIB into Sage to
> provide, among other things, multiprecision linear algebra.
It was me :) I am working on this issue. I expect that interface
between double precision ALGLIB and Python w
A while ago someone talked about incorporating ALGLIB into Sage to
provide, among other things, multiprecision linear algebra. I just saw
another package that does this:
http://mplapack.sourceforge.net/
Does anyone have experience with mplapack? How does it compare to
ALGLIB in linear algeb
