William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think I like David Kirkby's suggestion that we ship libstdc++. Even
> on Linux, not having it *does* cause trouble sometimes. At least, if
> we ship it then a sage binary built for LinuxDistro x.y will be more
> likely to work on LinuxDistro x'.y'. There hav
On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 at 12:16AM +, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> The current script for building a binary does not copy over either
> libgcc_s or libstdc++ runtime libraries. Yet Sage will be linked
> against them. I suspect you can get away with this on Linux, as those
> libraries will be present i
The current script for building a binary does not copy over either libgcc_s or
libstdc++ runtime libraries. Yet Sage will be linked against them. I suspect
you
can get away with this on Linux, as those libraries will be present in a
directory searched at runtime.
You can't get away without cop
