An idea that may be on the constructive side.
John could you convince/help Micheal to upload his current code
in a hg repo on google code like you did with eclib?
Rather than whining we could contribute and take a snapshot
when it is satisfactory.
Francois
This email may be confidential and subje
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Francois Bissey
wrote:
> I'll certainly commiserate with him being busy with his new baby (got a new
> one of my own on Monday, they are demanding little thing, let's not mention
> the students...)
Congratulations!
John
--
To post to this group, send an email t
> On 03/31/11 05:22 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> >As Dave Kirby remarked,
> >
> > right now it compiles on a couple of gcc releases and essentially no
> > other compiler. And thats hardly a surprise if you look at the code. At
> > the very least the endless compiler warnings need to be looked at /
> >
Some things to take into account:
Mike is certainly very busy now. (In the last half hour I have been
receiving alternate emails from him, and from sage-devel about
lcalc!).He is (co-)running the current semester at MSRI on
Arithmetic Statistics (other organisers including me, and William).
H
On 03/31/11 05:22 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
As Dave Kirby remarked,
right now it compiles on a couple of gcc releases and essentially no other
compiler. And thats hardly a surprise if you look at the code. At the very
least the endless compiler warnings need to be looked at / fixed.
Micheal did
On Thursday, March 31, 2011 1:08:35 PM UTC-4, robertwb wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Volker Braun
> wrote:
> > Is anybody working on either removing lcalc or getting its code up to
> > reasonable quality?
>
> Is it not giving you the right answers anymore?
>
In fact, it does not gi
If it would help at all he (Mike R) is in the office 3 doors down from
me right now at MSRI. But I would not like to forward any emails to
him which were not a lot more polite.
John
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
> Is anybody working on either removing lcalc or getting its code up to
> reasonable quality?
Is it not giving you the right answers anymore?
> Does anybody know the upstream author?
Yes, several of us.
> The lcalc spkg
> recently broke on g
On 2011-03-31 18:22, Volker Braun wrote:
> Is anybody working on either removing lcalc or getting its code up to
> reasonable quality? Does anybody know the upstream author? The lcalc
> spkg recently broke on gcc-4.6 essentially due to this:
>
> #define double(x) (double)(lcalc_to_double(x))
>
>
Is anybody working on either removing lcalc or getting its code up to
reasonable quality? Does anybody know the upstream author? The lcalc spkg
recently broke on gcc-4.6 essentially due to this:
#define double(x) (double)(lcalc_to_double(x))
I mean, WTF? Does anybody believe that you can safel
10 matches
Mail list logo
