Re: [sage-devel] installing optional spkgs under git

2013-12-18 Thread John Cremona
On 18 December 2013 16:54, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > You should still be able to do ./sage -i /path/to/xxx.spkg ... but only if the spkg-install has been updated, which my local copy hasn't, so I get errors (SAGE_DATA not defined). > > You're right, the online one should have worked too. Someone

Re: [sage-devel] installing optional spkgs under git

2013-12-18 Thread Robert Bradshaw
You should still be able to do ./sage -i /path/to/xxx.spkg You're right, the online one should have worked too. Someone updated the spkg without updating the checksums (maliciously or otherwise). On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 8:48 AM, John Cremona wrote: > I have the habit of installing a short list o

[sage-devel] installing optional spkgs under git

2013-12-18 Thread John Cremona
I have the habit of installing a short list of optional spkgs whenever I build a new Sage version on my machine, and to avoid downloads I have been keeping the .spkg files locally, and using sage -i /xxx.spkg I realise that this will probably not work (or will it?) with the the git arrangement, e.