See also the related #5532 about the syntax
sage: R. = QQ[]
Vincent
On 13/04/15 16:12, Daniel Krenn wrote:
Dear all,
for those who missed (as me up to now): there is a discussion going on at
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17958
about the future of the 'var'-command for creating symbolic
#5532 -> #5332
On 14/04/15 13:21, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
See also the related #5532 about the syntax
sage: R. = QQ[]
Vincent
On 13/04/15 16:12, Daniel Krenn wrote:
Dear all,
for those who missed (as me up to now): there is a discussion going on at
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17958
Dear all,
for those who missed (as me up to now): there is a discussion going on at
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17958
about the future of the 'var'-command for creating symbolic variables.
This post is to make this (important) discussion on sage-devel;
contributions are, as always, welcom
