On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 4:00 PM, William Stein wrote:
> We don't need a vote for experimental -- that's only for optional and
> standard.
> So, I've added chomp to experimental just now.
Why don't we have a vote to make it optional? It seems like pretty
solid code, much better than most of the o
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
The code looks quite clean - only two warnings.
But it will not build on Solaris. I suspect it needs the right
libraries linked, as things like gethostbyname need -lnsl.
Networking Services Library Functions gethostbyname(3NSL)
NAME
gethostbyname,g
On Feb 19, 2010, at 1:57 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
John H Palmieri wrote:
CHomP is a free (GPL version 2) software package for computing
homology (CHomP stands for Computation Homology Project.) See
chomp.rutgers.edu for some more information. I've prepared an
experimental spkg for it:
http
John H Palmieri wrote:
CHomP is a free (GPL version 2) software package for computing
homology (CHomP stands for Computation Homology Project.) See
chomp.rutgers.edu for some more information. I've prepared an
experimental spkg for it:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/palmieri/SPKG/chomp-2
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 3:56 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
> CHomP is a free (GPL version 2) software package for computing
> homology (CHomP stands for Computation Homology Project.) See
> chomp.rutgers.edu for some more information. I've prepared an
> experimental spkg for it:
>
> http://sage.mat
CHomP is a free (GPL version 2) software package for computing
homology (CHomP stands for Computation Homology Project.) See
chomp.rutgers.edu for some more information. I've prepared an
experimental spkg for it:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/palmieri/SPKG/chomp-20100213.spkg
If you succ
