Re: [sage-devel] cysignals/sig_on...sig_off

2023-05-05 Thread David Roe
I've banned the user. David On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 1:22:25 PM UTC-4 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 5:12 PM sumaiya qureshi > wrote: > > > > Hey All! > > > > Please let me know I am included within the accepted organization or not? > > > > According to Karachi, Pakistan timez

Re: [sage-devel] cysignals/sig_on...sig_off

2023-05-05 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 5:12 PM sumaiya qureshi wrote: > > Hey All! > > Please let me know I am included within the accepted organization or not? > > According to Karachi, Pakistan timezone last night was my GSoC'23 result. > > Please guide me through the procedure how to check my GSoC'23 result. >

Re: [sage-devel] cysignals/sig_on...sig_off

2023-05-05 Thread sumaiya qureshi
Hey All! Please let me know I am included within the accepted organization or not? According to Karachi, Pakistan timezone last night was my GSoC'23 result. Please guide me through the procedure how to check my GSoC'23 result. Name :- Sumaiya Qureshi (Karachi, Pakistan) I opted for Improvement

Re: [sage-devel] cysignals/sig_on...sig_off

2023-04-30 Thread David Roe
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 10:49 AM 'jonatha...@googlemail.com' via sage-devel wrote: > Does cysignals get enough support to keep going or do we want to try a > different approach? This different approach will for sure not be as > efficient, but will probably need less effort to maintain. > sig_on/

[sage-devel] cysignals/sig_on...sig_off

2023-04-30 Thread 'jonatha...@googlemail.com' via sage-devel
Hi, it's been over a year since the last activity on https://github.com/sagemath/cysignals. This could well be, because it is a good shape, but looking at the issues, I'm not too sure about that. Here are some issues, I know of: - sig_on/sig_off is poorly maintained and not thread safe - cysig