On Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 4:10:40 AM UTC-7 john.c...@gmail.com wrote:
> I suggest that the report by configure was not sufficiently helpful
> or informative. Should it not wither mark gcc as something necessary
> to be installed, or tell me that it cannot me?
It did say "(To override this
Thanks for the quick replies. I switched to the master branch and
there bootstrap+configure worked.
I suggest that the report by configure was not sufficiently helpful
or informative. Should it not wither mark gcc as something necessary
to be installed, or tell me that it cannot me?
I know tha
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 12:00 PM François Bissey wrote:
>
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33316 that’s what happened. Support for gcc
> lower than 6.3 removed. I don’t know if you can get a newer gcc from that
> ubuntu.
via a PPA it's possible, see e.g.
https://gist.github.com/jlblancoc/9952
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:57 AM John Cremona wrote:
>
> On a machine (Ubuntu 16.04.7 LTS) on which I have done a lot of Sage
> development before, and successfully built sage from source, from
> scratch, just a month ago (May 17 when 9.6 was released) with no
> problems.
>
> Now, I made a new
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33316 that’s what happened. Support for gcc
lower than 6.3 removed. I don’t know if you can get a newer gcc from that
ubuntu.
> On 22/06/2022, at 22:56, John Cremona wrote:
>
> On a machine (Ubuntu 16.04.7 LTS) on which I have done a lot of Sage
> development b
On a machine (Ubuntu 16.04.7 LTS) on which I have done a lot of Sage
development before, and successfully built sage from source, from
scratch, just a month ago (May 17 when 9.6 was released) with no
problems.
Now, I made a new clone of the source using
git clone https://github.com/sagemath/sa
