Brought to you by the Department of Redundancy Dept.
On Monday, April 4, 2016 at 1:52:44 PM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> Brought to you by the Department of Redundancy Dept.
>
>
> On Monday, April 4, 2016 at 10:25:35 PM UTC+2, Ursula Whitcher wrote:
>>
>> Would SageMath Software be better? Isn
Brought to you by the Department of Redundancy Dept.
On Monday, April 4, 2016 at 10:25:35 PM UTC+2, Ursula Whitcher wrote:
>
> Would SageMath Software be better? Isn't SageMath Mathematics Software
> a little redundant?
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Googl
On 4/1/2016 1:34 AM, Daniel Krenn wrote:
> I suggest something like:
>
> @Manual{SageMath:2016:7.1,
>key = {SageMath},
>author = {The SageMath Developers},
>title ={{SageMath} {M}athematics {S}oftware ({V}ersion 7.1)},
>note = {\url{http://www.sagemat
On 2016-03-31 23:15, Ursula Whitcher wrote:
> I noticed that the Wiki entry on citing Sage
>
> https://wiki.sagemath.org/Publications_using_SAGE
>
> does not reflect the rebranding of Sage as SageMath. How should the
> citation change?
In my opinion, yes!
I suggest something like:
@Manual{Sag
I noticed that the Wiki entry on citing Sage
https://wiki.sagemath.org/Publications_using_SAGE
does not reflect the rebranding of Sage as SageMath. How should the
citation change?
--Ursula.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To u
