On Friday, September 21, 2018 at 2:43:32 PM UTC+2, Thierry
(sage-googlesucks@xxx) wrote:
>
> Agreed. But how should we deal with testing networkx ?
Print a warning that nose is required and skip
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 01:40:38PM +0100, dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
> IMHO we don't want such legacy things as standard...
Agreed. But how should we deal with testing networkx ?
Ciao,
Thierry
>
> Dima
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 02:27:13PM +0200, Thierry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on the way to upgrading networkx, i noticed that the source code contains
> tests, but we do not ship any spkg-check script for that (yet).
>
> However, the check process requires nose, which is an optional package
> (note that ne
Hi,
on the way to upgrading networkx, i noticed that the source code contains
tests, but we do not ship any spkg-check script for that (yet).
However, the check process requires nose, which is an optional package
(note that networkx is standard). Is there a way to declare "check
dependencies" (e.
