On 2010-Jul-14 19:24:30 -0700, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
> wrote:
>> Peter Jeremy asked me if I'd look at the cephes package, as he was having
>> trouble with it. It's only installed on CYGWIN, so 99% of people are not
>> going to see that cephes is
[possibly OT] Out of curiosity, what was the rationale for going for
SAGE on Cygwin instead of MinGW?
Cheers,
Francesco.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more opt
On 15 July 2010 03:24, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
> wrote:
>> Peter Jeremy asked me if I'd look at the cephes package, as he was having
>> trouble with it. It's only installed on CYGWIN, so 99% of people are not
>> going to see that cephes is broken
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> Peter Jeremy asked me if I'd look at the cephes package, as he was having
> trouble with it. It's only installed on CYGWIN, so 99% of people are not
> going to see that cephes is broken.
>
> I hacked the package so that it would try to bui
Peter Jeremy asked me if I'd look at the cephes package, as he was having
trouble with it. It's only installed on CYGWIN, so 99% of people are not going
to see that cephes is broken.
I hacked the package so that it would try to build on any operating system - not
just Cygwin.
Anyway, it has
