> This is exactly what the patch I posted does.
>_<
Yeah. Right.
Just lost another occasion to keep quiet :-P
Nathann
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an ema
> Looks like the code that you
> change does not come from the same patch, but it looks to me that if a
> PermutationGroup handles both 1, ...,n and "a", "b", "c" as its
> elements, then I expect that it should handle 0, 1, 2 as it handles
> "a", "b", "c", that it to say probably with labels, and a
Hell !!!
> Here's a ticket with patch: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14845
H.. A long time ago I wrote a very nasty patch that prevented one
from building a Permutation on any set which was not 1, ..., n because
I got angry at the fact that many methods of Permutations
Here's a ticket with patch: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14845
--Mike
--Mike
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> (#14772 is a Permutations patch currently waiting for a review which touches
> a lot of things. Sooo if you want to patch it somehow, you will hav
(#14772 is a Permutations patch currently waiting for a review which
touches a lot of things. Sooo if you want to patch it somehow, you will
have to give it a look)
Nathann
On Monday, July 1, 2013 2:11:10 AM UTC+2, Mike Hansen wrote:
>
> A better workaround is something like:
>
> sage: P
A better workaround is something like:
sage: P = PermutationGroup([(0,1)], domain=[0,1]); P
Permutation Group with generators [(0,1)]
sage: P.domain()
{0, 1}
sage: P.list()
[(), (0,1)]
--Mike
--Mike
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Rob Beezer wrote:
> All,
>
> A power user sent me something ak
All,
A power user sent me something akin to:
sage: PermutationGroup([(1,2)])
Permutation Group with generators [(1,2)]
sage: PermutationGroup([('a','b')])
Permutation Group with generators [('a','b')]
sage: PermutationGroup([(0,1)])
--
