Hi
It would also be nice, if like R, one could run a system-wide install for
users
(e.g. in a university lab environment) and users could have optional
packages
either installed system-wide, or locally (e.g. .sage), and that those
packages
gracefully stated their minimum sage version to work on, o
On 26 November 2012 17:19, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> Raising the bar on Sage code quality creates this limbo area of code
> that's good enough to be shared/built upon, but not good enough to be
> included in Sage. The combinat folks seem to have realized this from
> the beginning (hence the combin
This is somewhat a continuation of the "permutations...again" thread,
but I think the topic is much broader than that. Over time
contributing Sage has become increasingly bureaucratic with the goal
(I hope) of getting higher-quality more-stable code.
Raising the bar on Sage code quality creates th