On 08/ 8/10 05:09 AM, Jason B Hill wrote:
In your opinion, is it better to leave the current behavior of including
fpu.c on Itanium Linux systems, or just remove that since it will be safer?
Be a bit careful with the language here. If someone has an older
(pre-Montecito) Itanium, then from wh
>
> In your opinion, is it better to leave the current behavior of including
> fpu.c on Itanium Linux systems, or just remove that since it will be safer?
>
>
Be a bit careful with the language here. If someone has an older
(pre-Montecito) Itanium, then from what I understand it is perfectly
plausi
On 08/ 6/10 04:06 AM, Jason B Hill wrote:
Has sympow been tested on Itanium Linux much?
Itanium versions exist in the repositories for Debian (Lenny/Sid), Ubuntu
and Fedora. So, the short answer is "yes."
Thank you.
If I'm not mistaken, that script will include x86 based code for the
floa
Has sympow been tested on Itanium Linux much?
>
Itanium versions exist in the repositories for Debian (Lenny/Sid), Ubuntu
and Fedora. So, the short answer is "yes."
>
> If I'm not mistaken, that script will include x86 based code for the
> floating point processor (in the file fpu.c) if the syst
Has sympow been tested on Itanium Linux much?
Anyone that reads sage-solaris will know John Palmieri has got Sage building on
fulvia (Solaris x86), but has some problems with sympow.
I decided to have a look at the sympow source code. It's not the easiest code to
follow, for various reasons.
