Am Freitag, 1. Juni 2018 21:04:00 UTC+2 schrieb mathzeta2:
>
> On 01/06/18 17:51, William Stein wrote:
> > But further, linking to dependencies should be done much more, but in
> > a way that provides clear value to users:
> >
> >- being able to read the original upstreams docs and source
On 01/06/18 17:51, William Stein wrote:
But further, linking to dependencies should be done much more, but in
a way that provides clear value to users:
- being able to read the original upstreams docs and source code more easily
One idea in this direction: I usually use `function?` or `func
Le vendredi 1 juin 2018 16:52:27 UTC+2, William a écrit :
[ Snip... ]
> E.g., there should be a much more
> prominent link to Gregory Bard's book "Sage for undergrads", and for
> the French (and soon English) book that Paul Z. started -- since many,
> many potential users of Sage are lost
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:46 AM, 'Bill Hart' via sage-devel
wrote:
> I have a suggestion how this could be made more equitable for the many
> dependencies of Sage.
Regarding revamping the main landing page, i think it should be done
in a way in which all design decisions are focused around maximiz
Hi all,
I've been aware for a while that some libraries are not happy that their
package is not explicitly mentioned by name on the sagemath.org home page
and that you have to click through to the "and many more" to see their
package credited.
I have a suggestion how this could be made more eq
