Re: [sage-devel] Segregating development from production

2012-03-09 Thread Julien Puydt
Le vendredi 09 mars, Keshav Kini a écrit: > - leave SPKG repos where they are for now Big sigh. I missed that line. Even bigger sigh. Snark on #sagemath -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubs

Re: [sage-devel] Segregating development from production

2012-03-09 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2012-03-09 06:18, Keshav Kini wrote: > Does this sound feasible? You would probably need to change a lot of hard-coded directories. So, lots of boring work but it could be done. > Something else: Why do we even have local/ ? Why not just have bin/, > lib/, etc. in the root directory? I like lo

Re: [sage-devel] Segregating development from production

2012-03-09 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
I would leave data/extcode alone for now. If you want to do something something with it, it should be part of "refactoring $SAGE_ROOT/data". I don't think extcode should be special-cased among the subdirectories of $SAGE_ROOT/data. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegrou

Re: [sage-devel] Segregating development from production

2012-03-09 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2012-03-09 09:29, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2012-03-09 06:18, Keshav Kini wrote: >> - Make `sage -b` also run `sage --python devel/sagenb/setup.py develop`, >> copy relevant files from devel/sagebin to local/bin/ , and copy >> relevant files from devel/sageext/ to... somewhere, perhaps shar

Re: [sage-devel] Segregating development from production

2012-03-09 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2012-03-09 06:18, Keshav Kini wrote: > - Make `sage -b` also run `sage --python devel/sagenb/setup.py develop`, > copy relevant files from devel/sagebin to local/bin/ , and copy > relevant files from devel/sageext/ to... somewhere, perhaps share/sage/ ? Thereby complicating the development p

Re: [sage-devel] Segregating development from production

2012-03-09 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2012-03-09 09:18, Julien Puydt wrote: > Le vendredi 09 mars, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit: >> You forget to address one very important point: *why* should we do >> this? Which problem will it solve? > > The problem of having a hundred of packages each its own repository, > its own history, with no si

Re: [sage-devel] Segregating development from production

2012-03-09 Thread Julien Puydt
Le vendredi 09 mars, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit: > You forget to address one very important point: *why* should we do > this? Which problem will it solve? The problem of having a hundred of packages each its own repository, its own history, with no simple way to get overviews? Snark on #sagemath --

Re: [sage-devel] Segregating development from production

2012-03-08 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
You forget to address one very important point: *why* should we do this? Which problem will it solve? -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this grou

[sage-devel] Segregating development from production

2012-03-08 Thread Keshav Kini
Hello, There has been a lot of talk recently about totally refactoring the way that a Sage installation is structured, which is great, but will no doubt take a lot of effort. Looking at the directory structure of lmonade (and talking to Burcin on this list about it a bit), as well as `R. Andrew O