Just for reference, another possibility for what you want might be provided
by PreTeXt: https://pretextbook.org
On Sunday, April 4, 2021 at 12:21:33 PM UTC-4 Michael Jung wrote:
> Here's the issue: https://github.com/sagemath/sagetex/issues/54
>
> I've provided a minimal example of the tcolorbox
Here's the issue: https://github.com/sagemath/sagetex/issues/54
I've provided a minimal example of the tcolorbox environment. Perhaps that
is something that can be added to sagetex if we get it to work?
Michael Jung schrieb am Sonntag, 4. April 2021 um 11:54:02 UTC+2:
> Anyway, I will approach
Anyway, I will approach this on the GitHub page. This problem is more
suited there than here. Thanks Dima!
Best,
Michael
Michael Jung schrieb am Sonntag, 4. April 2021 um 11:39:46 UTC+2:
> There is no bug or something. I just want to use sagetex beyond its
> current capabilities. Long story sh
There is no bug or something. I just want to use sagetex beyond its current
capabilities. Long story short, I would like to create a new environment
that combines a tcolorbox listing environment with a sageblock environment.
Since I don't have any approach yet, I cannot provide a minimal example
Hi,
could you file an issue in https://github.com/sagemath/sagetex -
with an example, showing what doesn't currently work.
Thanks
Dima
On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 9:49 PM Michael Jung wrote:
>
>
> Hello everyone,
> I would appreciate some help from an TeX expert. Namely, I would like to
> combine tco
Hello everyone,
I would appreciate some help from an TeX expert. Namely, I would like to
combine tcolorboxes with the sageblock environment of sagetex. I already
have my own tcolorbox format for Sage code in Jupyter style. In particular
I use the "\newtcblisting" command together with "listing
Dear sagetex users,
please test
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27024
Thanks,
Dima
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@google
I'm trying to compile sage from source, and I'm stuck on this step
currently.
```
Compiled with zlib 1.2.8; using zlib 1.2.8
Compiled with poppler version 0.24.5
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.5-1.40.14 (TeX Live 2013/Debian)
restricted \write18 enabled.
entering extended mode
(./example.t
Hi all,
I'm preparing a brief talk on using SageTeX, and discovering that the
tutorial seems to be incorrect. See http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17068
I'm emailing sage-devel because a) I don't have time to fix this but b) I
think this is pretty critical, since people are often asking about
On Jul 16, 2012, at 06:16 , kcrisman wrote:
>
> On Sunday, July 15, 2012 5:08:08 PM UTC-4, Justin C. Walker wrote:
[snip]
>> My comment: in the doc section on TeXShop, it is mentioned that one should
>> add the line
>> %!TEX TS-program = sage
>> at the top of the document. I think the d
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 5:08:08 PM UTC-4, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
> And a followup:
>
> On Jul 15, 2012, at 13:56 , Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
> > This deals with the use of SageTeX on Mac OS X/TeXShop, so if that's not
> of interest, feel free to delete and move on.
> >
> > I just got fin
And a followup:
On Jul 15, 2012, at 13:56 , Justin C. Walker wrote:
> This deals with the use of SageTeX on Mac OS X/TeXShop, so if that's not of
> interest, feel free to delete and move on.
>
> I just got finished a long detour into using SageTeX with TeXShop on Mac OS
> X, and have a questio
Hi, all,
This deals with the use of SageTeX on Mac OS X/TeXShop, so if that's not of
interest, feel free to delete and move on.
I just got finished a long detour into using SageTeX with TeXShop on Mac OS X,
and have a question and a couple of comments.
It's been mentioned here that SageTeX cha
Hi, all,
I started experimenting with SageTeX, but, having unbridled optimism, I did
this with a Beamer template. It turns out that the two don't seem to mix.
Has anyone had any luck using SageTeX in this way?
I'm attaching two minimal examples.
Tst1 is from a beamer template, and shows the k
sage-devel,
The SageTeX files released in 5.0.1 seem to be halfway-through a change in
naming convention. Here is a typical usage in SageTeX with Sage 4.x.
pdflatex q.tex
sage q.sage
pdflatex q.tex
pdflatex q.tex
# plots are in sage-plots-for-q.tex
That running pdflatex on q
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 at 04:07PM +0200, Jan Groenewald wrote:
> Hi
>
> 0 jan@muizenberg:/var/autofs/misc/home/jan$grep example.sage
> /usr/local/src/sage-4.7.2/local/share/texmf/tex/generic/sagetex/example.tex
> % (pdf)latex example.tex; sage example.sage; pdflatex example.tex
> when running Sage
Hi
0 jan@muizenberg:/var/autofs/misc/home/jan$grep example.sage
/usr/local/src/sage-4.7.2/local/share/texmf/tex/generic/sagetex/example.tex
% (pdf)latex example.tex; sage example.sage; pdflatex example.tex
when running Sage on \texttt{example.sage}, that gets printed to the
In sage 4.7.2 the fi
On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 at 07:28AM -0700, Jason Grout wrote:
> I just updated my MacTeX installation, and it said sagetex was
> "deleted on server". I thought sagetex was included in the TeXLive
> distribution (which is I believe what MacTeX is based on); was it
> removed?
Yes. I decided that, since
I just updated my MacTeX installation, and it said sagetex was "deleted
on server". I thought sagetex was included in the TeXLive distribution
(which is I believe what MacTeX is based on); was it removed?
Thanks,
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 at 02:21PM -0800, William Stein wrote:
> Then, I'd say we have a winner!
>
> SageTex is going in:
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7617
Just a couple hours before this message about SageTeX being accepted
into the main Sage distribution, I got an email about
2009/12/7 Dan Drake :
> On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 at 01:29PM -0800, Craig Citro wrote:
>> > +1 to SageTex
>> >
>> > +1 to 2 year maintenance commitment for new packages, though I think
>> > this should be discussed in another thread
>> >
>>
>> I'm also +1 on both of these, and on this general policy bein
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 at 01:29PM -0800, Craig Citro wrote:
> > +1 to SageTex
> >
> > +1 to 2 year maintenance commitment for new packages, though I think
> > this should be discussed in another thread
> >
>
> I'm also +1 on both of these, and on this general policy being
> discussed in a new thread.
>> What do you guys think about doing something similar for new standard
>> spkg's for Sage? I think 5 years is too long, given how new Sage is.
>> 1 year or 2 years might be more reasonable, given the youth of Sage.
>
> +1 to SageTex
>
> +1 to 2 year maintenance commitment for new packages, tho
> What do you guys think about doing something similar for new standard
> spkg's for Sage? I think 5 years is too long, given how new Sage is.
> 1 year or 2 years might be more reasonable, given the youth of Sage.
+1 to SageTex
+1 to 2 year maintenance commitment for new packages, though I thi
2009/12/7 Robert Bradshaw :
> On Dec 6, 2009, at 11:03 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to propose that SageTex be made a standard Sage package.
>> To install:
>>
>> sage -i sagetex-2.1.1
>>
>> And look here for a very nice paper about how to use SageTex.
>>
>> http://tug.ct
On Dec 6, 2009, at 11:03 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose that SageTex be made a standard Sage package.
> To install:
>
> sage -i sagetex-2.1.1
>
> And look here for a very nice paper about how to use SageTex.
>
> http://tug.ctan.org/pkg/sagetex
>
> Dan Drake: "SageTe
> [X] Yes!
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose that SageTex be made a standard Sage package.
> To install:
>
>sage -i sagetex-2.1.1
>
> And look here for a very nice paper about how to use SageTex.
>
>http://tug.ctan.org/pkg/sagetex
>
> Dan Drake: "SageTeX is small, its inclusi
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 11:03:08PM -0800, William Stein wrote:
>
> Please vote:
> [X] Yes!
--
Alex Ghitza -- Lecturer in Mathematics -- The University of Melbourne
-- Australia -- http://www.ms.unimelb.edu.au/~aghitza/
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.co
> [ ] Yes!
+1
Nick
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Hi
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 11:03:08PM -0800, William Stein wrote:
> I would like to propose that SageTex be made a standard Sage package.
> Dan Drake: "SageTeX is small, its inclusion cannot possibly negatively
> affect anything else in Sage, and it's very useful."
>
[X] Yes!
regards,
Jan
--
Hi,
I would like to propose that SageTex be made a standard Sage package.
To install:
sage -i sagetex-2.1.1
And look here for a very nice paper about how to use SageTex.
http://tug.ctan.org/pkg/sagetex
Dan Drake: "SageTeX is small, its inclusion cannot possibly negatively
affect anything
32 matches
Mail list logo
