On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 12:24 AM Volker Braun wrote:
>
> Since Erik is clamoring for a more calendar-driven release schedule, here is
> a quick A/B test:
>
> A) Keep the current process of releasing approximately every 3 months, longer
> if people insist on having their own pet tickets merged at
Ahem...
Le jeudi 19 juillet 2018 01:20:28 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit :
[ Snip... ]
The same people that wish for a rigid schedule now will complain later
> that they missed the merge window by a day ;-)
>
Hmmm... Bayesian suggestion : make the schedule dates random variables and
publish th
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 1:05 AM William Stein wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> > Since Erik is clamoring for a more calendar-driven release schedule, here is
> > a quick A/B test:
> >
> > A) Keep the current process of releasing approximately every 3 months,
> > l
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:09 AM Volker Braun wrote:
>
> On Thursday, July 19, 2018 at 8:50:12 AM UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>>
>> C) Don't keep a strict time table, but announce at some point during the
>> beta releases when you plan to cut off the merge window.
>
>
> Thats a bit of a cop out,
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 8:50 AM Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2018-07-19 00:24, Volker Braun wrote:
> > Since Erik is clamoring for a more calendar-driven release schedule,
> > here is a quick A/B test:
> >
> > A) Keep the current process of releasing approximately every 3 months,
> > longer if peo
On Thursday, July 19, 2018 at 8:50:12 AM UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> C) Don't keep a strict time table, but announce at some point during the
> beta releases when you plan to cut off the merge window.
>
Thats a bit of a cop out, what do you mean by "at some point"?
This time I wrote in the
On 2018-07-19 08:50, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2018-07-19 00:24, Volker Braun wrote:
>> Since Erik is clamoring for a more calendar-driven release schedule,
>> here is a quick A/B test:
>>
>> A) Keep the current process of releasing approximately every 3 months,
>> longer if people insist on havin
On 2018-07-19 00:24, Volker Braun wrote:
Since Erik is clamoring for a more calendar-driven release schedule,
here is a quick A/B test:
A) Keep the current process of releasing approximately every 3 months,
longer if people insist on having their own pet tickets merged at the
last minute.
B) Ke
No, I'm fine with either way. Personally, I think more flexibility is going
to be an advantage most of the time. Though I also see how strict rules
appeal to mathematicians. The same people that wish for a rigid schedule
now will complain later that they missed the merge window by a day ;-) Both
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> Since Erik is clamoring for a more calendar-driven release schedule, here is
> a quick A/B test:
>
> A) Keep the current process of releasing approximately every 3 months,
> longer if people insist on having their own pet tickets merged at the
Since Erik is clamoring for a more calendar-driven release schedule, here
is a quick A/B test:
A) Keep the current process of releasing approximately every 3 months,
longer if people insist on having their own pet tickets merged at the last
minute.
B) Keep a strict time table: Merge window is
11 matches
Mail list logo
