On 4/11/12 3:29 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
On Wednesday, April 11, 2012 12:13:50 AM UTC+1, jason wrote:
The Sage cell server spkg includes both zmq and pyzmq since we use
these
to communicate.
Just to be clear, you haven't written spkgs for zeromq/pyzmq but just
have them as dependenc
On Wednesday, April 11, 2012 12:13:50 AM UTC+1, jason wrote:
>
> The Sage cell server spkg includes both zmq and pyzmq since we use these
> to communicate.
>
Just to be clear, you haven't written spkgs for zeromq/pyzmq but just have
them as dependencies? Because I couldn't find any spkgs except
On 4/9/12 6:07 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
Are we going to make zeromq+pyzmq a standard spkg anytime soon, or is
anybody opposed to doing so? I think a communication framework would be
potentially of more use than just for the notebook server, but I haven't
seen any efforts towards including zeromq.
I am very interested as well. I'd be happy to help with anything. I
would also like to be CC'd (afleckenstein) on any ticket you create.
On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 06:30 -0700, Niles Johnson wrote:
>
> On Monday, April 9, 2012 7:07:14 AM UTC-4, Volker Braun wrote:
> I think it would be of gene
On Monday, April 9, 2012 7:07:14 AM UTC-4, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> I think it would be of general interest, but of course depends on zeromq.
Indeed, I am interested! Please Cc me ("niles") on any ticket you make for
this!
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
On Monday, April 9, 2012 7:07:14 PM UTC+8, Volker Braun wrote:
>
>
> On an unrelated note, zeromq was just forked by two of the original
> developers, see http://www.crossroads.io. Though I think for Sage
> purposes it doesn't matter which library provides the zeromq API.
>
There is a good artic
