> I believe there used to be such a license, and its use was so low
> that they discontinued it. However, I wonder if having the
> attribution in, e.g., the .tex source would be sufficient. This would
> probably be a good happy medium.
Taking a closer look at the CC site, I found this in
h
> > It would likely be better to start a page on wiki.sagemath.org.
> > Could you do so?Then Harald Schilly (sagemath.org webmaster)
> > could add a prominent link to that page.
>
> You mean on how to get files there or a page to aggregate the talks?
> Because I, as a newbie to sage, don't kno
On Nov 5, 2008, at 11:31 AM, Ronan Paixão wrote:
> Em Qua, 2008-11-05 às 13:23 -0400, David Joyner escreveu:
>> Should we consider creating our own "Sage documentation license"?
>> As was pointed out, "public domain" not only doesn't exist in some
>> countries, it also isn't a license technically
On Nov 5, 10:23 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am personally happy with the GFDL 1.3, but some might find it
> a bit of overkill.
FWIW for Maxima I have pressed for new documents to be
licensed under GPL. Having the same license for documents
and code means stuff can be freely
Em Qua, 2008-11-05 às 13:23 -0400, David Joyner escreveu:
> Should we consider creating our own "Sage documentation license"?
> As was pointed out, "public domain" not only doesn't exist in some
> countries, it also isn't a license technically speaking.
Just now I noticed on the CC page that in B
On Nov 5, 9:23 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should we consider creating our own "Sage documentation license"?\
-1 - the will only cause more license proliferation.
> As was pointed out, "public domain" not only doesn't exist in some
> countries, it also isn't a license techn
Should we consider creating our own "Sage documentation license"?
As was pointed out, "public domain" not only doesn't exist in some
countries, it also isn't a license technically speaking.
I am personally happy with the GFDL 1.3, but some might find it
a bit of overkill.
Comments? Unless people
Martin Albrecht wrote:
>
> I suppose my preferred copyright statement is something like this: "I don't
> care what you do with these slides and I happily provide TeX sources. You
> might violate someone's copyright though, but that is your problem." Don't
> get me wrong: You are of course righ
On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Jason Grout wrote:
> Martin Albrecht wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Jason Grout wrote:
> >> Martin Albrecht wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Ronan Paixão wrote:
> Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 17:44 -0800, William Stein escreveu:
> > On Tue, No
Martin Albrecht wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Jason Grout wrote:
>> Martin Albrecht wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Ronan Paixão wrote:
Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 17:44 -0800, William Stein escreveu:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Ronan Paixão
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Jason Grout wrote:
> Martin Albrecht wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Ronan Paixão wrote:
> >> Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 17:44 -0800, William Stein escreveu:
> >>> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Ronan Paixão
> >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > wrote:
> Ther
Martin Albrecht wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Ronan Paixão wrote:
>> Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 17:44 -0800, William Stein escreveu:
>>> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Ronan Paixão <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
There are no talks from 2008. Somewhere there should be instructions on
>>>
On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Ronan Paixão wrote:
> Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 17:44 -0800, William Stein escreveu:
> > On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Ronan Paixão <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > There are no talks from 2008. Somewhere there should be instructions on
> > > how to get files there (
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Ronan Paixão <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 17:44 -0800, William Stein escreveu:
>> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Ronan Paixão <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > There are no talks from 2008. Somewhere there should be instructions on
>> >
Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 17:44 -0800, William Stein escreveu:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Ronan Paixão <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > There are no talks from 2008. Somewhere there should be instructions on
> > how to get files there (who to send to). I noticed there have been quite
> > som
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Ronan Paixão <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There are no talks from 2008. Somewhere there should be instructions on
> how to get files there (who to send to). I noticed there have been quite
> some talks around since I started watching this list.
It would likely b
There are no talks from 2008. Somewhere there should be instructions on
how to get files there (who to send to). I noticed there have been quite
some talks around since I started watching this list.
Ronan
Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 11:19 -0800, William Stein escreveu:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:14 A
Wow, the last talks in there are from 2007!
Here are mine, feel free to add them:
OKCon:
http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb/talks/20080315%20-%20Sage%20-%20OKCon%20-%20London.pdf
Trophees du libre:
http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb/talks/20071129%20-%20Sage%20-%20Soissons.pdf
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Ronan Paixão <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Would it be possible to create a repository of talks about sage?
>
> Ronan Paixão
It would be good to add to this:
http://sagemath.org/talks/
William
>
> Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 01:08 -0800, Craig Citro escreveu:
>> Hey
Would it be possible to create a repository of talks about sage?
Ronan Paixão
Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 01:08 -0800, Craig Citro escreveu:
> Hey Martin -- this looks great! In fact, I'm giving an Intro to Sage
> talk at SD11 on Friday ... I'm tempted to just reuse your slides! :P
>
> -cc
>
> On Mo
On Tuesday 04 November 2008, Jason Grout wrote:
> Does your permission to use your slides extend to others?
Definitely! I even wrote a README.txt:
"""
Feel free to re-use these slides for whatever purpose.
"""
Cheers,
Martin
--
name: Martin Albrecht
_pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup
Martin Albrecht wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 November 2008, Craig Citro wrote:
>>> Go for it! I can upload my sources to sage.math. I would add some
>>> history/background for SD11 though.
>> Oh, I was mostly kidding -- but actually, please upload the sources!
>> Your beamer slides are WAY prettier than
On Tuesday 04 November 2008, Craig Citro wrote:
> > Go for it! I can upload my sources to sage.math. I would add some
> > history/background for SD11 though.
>
> Oh, I was mostly kidding -- but actually, please upload the sources!
> Your beamer slides are WAY prettier than the ones I create. Amusi
> Go for it! I can upload my sources to sage.math. I would add some
> history/background for SD11 though.
>
Oh, I was mostly kidding -- but actually, please upload the sources!
Your beamer slides are WAY prettier than the ones I create. Amusingly,
I stole the template I currently use from your ta
On Tuesday 04 November 2008, Craig Citro wrote:
> Hey Martin -- this looks great! In fact, I'm giving an Intro to Sage
> talk at SD11 on Friday ... I'm tempted to just reuse your slides! :P
Go for it! I can upload my sources to sage.math. I would add some
history/background for SD11 though.
Mar
On Tuesday 04 November 2008, David Joyner wrote:
> I think it's excellent. I laughed at the intro to the Sage definition too.
> Very good.
>
> Someone was just asking me a question related to the program
> you used to create the graph of on page 26. Is this a graph of
> Sage classes? What is the p
Hey Martin -- this looks great! In fact, I'm giving an Intro to Sage
talk at SD11 on Friday ... I'm tempted to just reuse your slides! :P
-cc
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Martin Albrecht
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I'll give a talk on Sage this Thursday to the PhD student sem
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 at 02:58AM -0500, David Joyner wrote:
>> I think it's excellent. I laughed at the intro to the Sage definition
>> too. Very good.
>
> I was totally not expecting 4chan to appear in a Sage talk...
>
>> Also,
On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 at 02:58AM -0500, David Joyner wrote:
> I think it's excellent. I laughed at the intro to the Sage definition
> too. Very good.
I was totally not expecting 4chan to appear in a Sage talk...
> Also, what font are you using? I like it. Maybe Arial or Veranda?
Looks like a stand
I think it's excellent. I laughed at the intro to the Sage definition too.
Very good.
Someone was just asking me a question related to the program
you used to create the graph of on page 26. Is this a graph of
Sage classes? What is the program/command called?
Also, what font are you using? I lik
30 matches
Mail list logo
