On Jul 2, 8:08 am, William Stein wrote:
> No. This can and will work fine. In fact it already *does* with
> interact. Here's a tutorial:
Hi William,
Thanks for the tutorial - I'll play with that idea some. Once I wrap
my head around the other ideas and approaches being discussed.
More disc
Rob Beezer wrote:
> On Jul 1, 10:59 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
>> What I'm talking about is a lightweight tinymce-like control that would
>> be able to sections of represent Sage code with a graphical widget, like
>> replacing Graph({0:[2,3], 1:[3],2:[3,4]}) with Rado's graph editor, or a
>> symbolic
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
>
> On Jul 1, 10:59 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
>> What I'm talking about is a lightweight tinymce-like control that would
>> be able to sections of represent Sage code with a graphical widget, like
>> replacing Graph({0:[2,3], 1:[3],2:[3,4]}) with Rad
On Jul 1, 10:59 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> What I'm talking about is a lightweight tinymce-like control that would
> be able to sections of represent Sage code with a graphical widget, like
> replacing Graph({0:[2,3], 1:[3],2:[3,4]}) with Rado's graph editor, or a
> symbolic expression with Davide'
I would like to help in the embedding of my graph editor. Mainly to
save someone the effort of reading my code (as someone else put other
people's code is like other people's underwear).
What is the status of the sage - frontend decoupling? I played with
codenode and it seems to be getting there.
